From: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net
commit 832c6f2c29ec519b766923937f4f93fb1008b47d upstream
Right now unprivileged tests are never executed as a BPF test run, only loaded. Allow for running them as well so that we can check the outcome and probe for regressions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang yangtiezhu@loongson.cn --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index d33d1d7..38dd129 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct bpf_test { int fixup_cgroup_storage[MAX_FIXUPS]; const char *errstr; const char *errstr_unpriv; - uint32_t retval; + uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv; enum { UNDEF, ACCEPT, @@ -2986,6 +2986,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .fixup_prog1 = { 2 }, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 42, + /* Verifier rewrite for unpriv skips tail call here. */ + .retval_unpriv = 2, }, { "stack pointer arithmetic", @@ -12811,6 +12813,33 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog, } }
+static int set_admin(bool admin) +{ + cap_t caps; + const cap_value_t cap_val = CAP_SYS_ADMIN; + int ret = -1; + + caps = cap_get_proc(); + if (!caps) { + perror("cap_get_proc"); + return -1; + } + if (cap_set_flag(caps, CAP_EFFECTIVE, 1, &cap_val, + admin ? CAP_SET : CAP_CLEAR)) { + perror("cap_set_flag"); + goto out; + } + if (cap_set_proc(caps)) { + perror("cap_set_proc"); + goto out; + } + ret = 0; +out: + if (cap_free(caps)) + perror("cap_free"); + return ret; +} + static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, int *passes, int *errors) { @@ -12819,6 +12848,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, struct bpf_insn *prog = test->insns; int map_fds[MAX_NR_MAPS]; const char *expected_err; + uint32_t expected_val; uint32_t retval; int i, err;
@@ -12836,6 +12866,8 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, test->result_unpriv : test->result; expected_err = unpriv && test->errstr_unpriv ? test->errstr_unpriv : test->errstr; + expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ? + test->retval_unpriv : test->retval;
reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 && (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && @@ -12869,16 +12901,20 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, __u8 tmp[TEST_DATA_LEN << 2]; __u32 size_tmp = sizeof(tmp);
+ if (unpriv) + set_admin(true); err = bpf_prog_test_run(fd_prog, 1, test->data, sizeof(test->data), tmp, &size_tmp, &retval, NULL); + if (unpriv) + set_admin(false); if (err && errno != 524/*ENOTSUPP*/ && errno != EPERM) { printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error\n"); goto fail_log; } - if (!err && retval != test->retval && - test->retval != POINTER_VALUE) { - printf("FAIL retval %d != %d\n", retval, test->retval); + if (!err && retval != expected_val && + expected_val != POINTER_VALUE) { + printf("FAIL retval %d != %d\n", retval, expected_val); goto fail_log; } } @@ -12921,33 +12957,6 @@ static bool is_admin(void) return (sysadmin == CAP_SET); }
-static int set_admin(bool admin) -{ - cap_t caps; - const cap_value_t cap_val = CAP_SYS_ADMIN; - int ret = -1; - - caps = cap_get_proc(); - if (!caps) { - perror("cap_get_proc"); - return -1; - } - if (cap_set_flag(caps, CAP_EFFECTIVE, 1, &cap_val, - admin ? CAP_SET : CAP_CLEAR)) { - perror("cap_set_flag"); - goto out; - } - if (cap_set_proc(caps)) { - perror("cap_set_proc"); - goto out; - } - ret = 0; -out: - if (cap_free(caps)) - perror("cap_free"); - return ret; -} - static void get_unpriv_disabled() { char buf[2];