5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@linaro.org
commit 28d3d0696688154cc04983f343011d07bf0508e4 upstream.
The i2c_master_send/recv() functions return negative error codes or they return "len" on success. So the error handling here can be written as just normal checks for "if (ret < 0) return ret;". No need to complicate things.
Btw, in this code the "len" parameter can never be zero, but even if it were, then I feel like this would still be the best way to write it.
Fixes: 914437992876 ("drm/bridge: nxp-ptn3460: fix i2c_master_send() error checking") Suggested-by: Neil Armstrong neil.armstrong@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Robert Foss rfoss@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Robert Foss rfoss@kernel.org Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/04242630-42d8-4920-8c67-24ac9d... Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nxp-ptn3460.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nxp-ptn3460.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nxp-ptn3460.c @@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ static int ptn3460_read_bytes(struct ptn int ret;
ret = i2c_master_send(ptn_bridge->client, &addr, 1); - if (ret <= 0) { + if (ret < 0) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to send i2c command, ret=%d\n", ret); - return ret ?: -EIO; + return ret; }
ret = i2c_master_recv(ptn_bridge->client, buf, len); - if (ret != len) { + if (ret < 0) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to recv i2c data, ret=%d\n", ret); - return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO; + return ret; }
return 0; @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ static int ptn3460_write_byte(struct ptn buf[1] = val;
ret = i2c_master_send(ptn_bridge->client, buf, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)); - if (ret != ARRAY_SIZE(buf)) { + if (ret < 0) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to send i2c command, ret=%d\n", ret); - return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO; + return ret; }
return 0;