7 May
2025
7 May
'25
3:52 p.m.
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 04:47:10PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 10:25:25AM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
[...]
Otherwise the original sizeof * change isn't really fixing anything.
How about extending the check for entry->length ? Do you think it will be any better ? The entry pointer is anyway updated to jump entry->length ahead at the end of the loop.
Scratch that, we will still end up reading an invalid node at the end if (entry + entry->length > table_end)
--
Regards,
Sudeep