4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net
[ upstream commit d269176e766c71c998cb75b4ea8cbc321cc0019d ]
While working on 16338a9b3ac3 ("bpf, arm64: fix out of bounds access in tail call") I noticed that ppc64 JIT is partially affected as well. While the bound checking is correctly performed as unsigned comparison, the register with the index value however, is never truncated into 32 bit space, so e.g. a index value of 0x100000000ULL with a map of 1 element would pass with PPC_CMPLW() whereas we later on continue with the full 64 bit register value. Therefore, as we do in interpreter and other JITs truncate the value to 32 bit initially in order to fix access.
Fixes: ce0761419fae ("powerpc/bpf: Implement support for tail calls") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 * * goto out; */ PPC_LWZ(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_bpf_array, offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries)); + PPC_RLWINM(b2p_index, b2p_index, 0, 0, 31); PPC_CMPLW(b2p_index, b2p[TMP_REG_1]); PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out);