4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yunlei He heyunlei@huawei.com
commit bb413d6acd4e1c361daebf8486efc3923f429792 upstream.
we came across an error as below:
[build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 1718] addr[0x 1c18ddc] ino[0x 1718] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 1719] addr[0x 1c193d5] ino[0x 1719] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171a] addr[0x 1c1736e] ino[0x 171a] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171b] addr[0x 58b3ee8f] ino[0x815f92ed] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171c] addr[0x fcdc94b] ino[0x49366377] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171d] addr[0x 7cd2facf] ino[0xb3c55300] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171e] addr[0x bd4e25d0] ino[0x77c34c09]
... ...
[build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 1718] addr[0x 1c18ddc] ino[0x 1718] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 1719] addr[0x 1c193d5] ino[0x 1719] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171a] addr[0x 1c1736e] ino[0x 171a] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171b] addr[0x 58b3ee8f] ino[0x815f92ed] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171c] addr[0x fcdc94b] ino[0x49366377] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171d] addr[0x 7cd2facf] ino[0xb3c55300] [build_nat_area_bitmap:1710] nid[0x 171e] addr[0x bd4e25d0] ino[0x77c34c09]
One nat block may be stepped by a data block, so this patch forbid to write if the blkaddr is illegal
Signed-off-by: Yunlei He heyunlei@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/f2fs/segment.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h @@ -576,8 +576,8 @@ static inline void check_seg_range(struc
static inline void verify_block_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blk_addr) { - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, blk_addr < SEG0_BLKADDR(sbi) - || blk_addr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi)); + BUG_ON(blk_addr < SEG0_BLKADDR(sbi) + || blk_addr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi)); }
/*