Since, two suspend-resume cycles are required to enter hibernate and, since we only need to enable idle optimizations in the first cycle (which is pretty much equivalent to s2idle). We can check in_s0ix, to prevent the system from entering idle optimizations before it actually enters hibernate (from display's perspective).
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10+ Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c index 4651b884d8d9..546a168a2fbf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c @@ -2996,10 +2996,11 @@ static int dm_suspend(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
hpd_rx_irq_work_suspend(dm);
- if (adev->dm.dc->caps.ips_support) - dc_allow_idle_optimizations(adev->dm.dc, true); - dc_set_power_state(dm->dc, DC_ACPI_CM_POWER_STATE_D3); + + if (dm->dc->caps.ips_support && adev->in_s0ix) + dc_allow_idle_optimizations(dm->dc, true); + dc_dmub_srv_set_power_state(dm->dc->ctx->dmub_srv, DC_ACPI_CM_POWER_STATE_D3);
return 0;
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 4:43 PM Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com wrote:
Since, two suspend-resume cycles are required to enter hibernate and, since we only need to enable idle optimizations in the first cycle (which is pretty much equivalent to s2idle). We can check in_s0ix, to prevent the system from entering idle optimizations before it actually enters hibernate (from display's perspective).
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10+ Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c index 4651b884d8d9..546a168a2fbf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c @@ -2996,10 +2996,11 @@ static int dm_suspend(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
hpd_rx_irq_work_suspend(dm);
if (adev->dm.dc->caps.ips_support)
dc_allow_idle_optimizations(adev->dm.dc, true);
dc_set_power_state(dm->dc, DC_ACPI_CM_POWER_STATE_D3);
if (dm->dc->caps.ips_support && adev->in_s0ix)
dc_allow_idle_optimizations(dm->dc, true);
Is the ordering change with respect to dc_set_power_state() intended?
Alex
dc_dmub_srv_set_power_state(dm->dc->ctx->dmub_srv, DC_ACPI_CM_POWER_STATE_D3); return 0;
-- 2.46.0
On 10/4/24 16:44, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 4:43 PM Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com wrote:
Since, two suspend-resume cycles are required to enter hibernate and, since we only need to enable idle optimizations in the first cycle (which is pretty much equivalent to s2idle). We can check in_s0ix, to prevent the system from entering idle optimizations before it actually enters hibernate (from display's perspective).
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10+ Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c index 4651b884d8d9..546a168a2fbf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c @@ -2996,10 +2996,11 @@ static int dm_suspend(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
hpd_rx_irq_work_suspend(dm);
if (adev->dm.dc->caps.ips_support)
dc_allow_idle_optimizations(adev->dm.dc, true);
dc_set_power_state(dm->dc, DC_ACPI_CM_POWER_STATE_D3);
if (dm->dc->caps.ips_support && adev->in_s0ix)
dc_allow_idle_optimizations(dm->dc, true);
Is the ordering change with respect to dc_set_power_state() intended?
Yup, it's safer to set idle opts after dc_set_power_state(), since it involves a write to DMUB.
Alex
dc_dmub_srv_set_power_state(dm->dc->ctx->dmub_srv, DC_ACPI_CM_POWER_STATE_D3); return 0;
-- 2.46.0
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 4:49 PM Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com wrote:
On 10/4/24 16:44, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 4:43 PM Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com wrote:
Since, two suspend-resume cycles are required to enter hibernate and, since we only need to enable idle optimizations in the first cycle (which is pretty much equivalent to s2idle). We can check in_s0ix, to prevent the system from entering idle optimizations before it actually enters hibernate (from display's perspective).
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10+ Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c index 4651b884d8d9..546a168a2fbf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c @@ -2996,10 +2996,11 @@ static int dm_suspend(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
hpd_rx_irq_work_suspend(dm);
if (adev->dm.dc->caps.ips_support)
dc_allow_idle_optimizations(adev->dm.dc, true);
dc_set_power_state(dm->dc, DC_ACPI_CM_POWER_STATE_D3);
if (dm->dc->caps.ips_support && adev->in_s0ix)
dc_allow_idle_optimizations(dm->dc, true);
Is the ordering change with respect to dc_set_power_state() intended?
Yup, it's safer to set idle opts after dc_set_power_state(), since it involves a write to DMUB.
Might want to mention that in the commit message. With that: Acked-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com
Alex
dc_dmub_srv_set_power_state(dm->dc->ctx->dmub_srv, DC_ACPI_CM_POWER_STATE_D3); return 0;
-- 2.46.0
-- Hamza
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org