This reverts commit a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain").
Using the GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK tells genpd to gate/ungate the consumer device's clock(s) during runtime suspend/resume through the PM clock API. More precisely, in genpd_runtime_resume() the clock(s) for the consumer device would become ungated prior to the driver-level ->runtime_resume() callbacks gets invoked.
This behaviour isn't a good fit for all platforms/drivers. For example, a driver may need to make some preparations of its device in its ->runtime_resume() callback, like calling clk_set_rate() before the clock(s) should be ungated. In these cases, it's easier to let the clock(s) to be managed solely by the driver, rather than at the PM domain level.
For these reasons, let's drop the use GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK for the SCMI PM domain, as to enable it to be more easily adopted across ARM platforms.
Fixes: a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain") Cc: Nicolas Pitre npitre@baylibre.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org ---
To get some more background to $subject patch, please have a look at the lore-link below.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR04MB94173B45A2CFEE3BF1BD313A88409@DU0PR04MB...
Kind regards Ulf Hansson
--- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c | 26 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c index 581d34c95769..d5dee625de78 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/pm_clock.h> #include <linux/pm_domain.h> #include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
@@ -53,27 +52,6 @@ static int scmi_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) return scmi_pd_power(domain, false); }
-static int scmi_pd_attach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *pd, struct device *dev) -{ - int ret; - - ret = pm_clk_create(dev); - if (ret) - return ret; - - ret = of_pm_clk_add_clks(dev); - if (ret >= 0) - return 0; - - pm_clk_destroy(dev); - return ret; -} - -static void scmi_pd_detach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *pd, struct device *dev) -{ - pm_clk_destroy(dev); -} - static int scmi_pm_domain_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev) { int num_domains, i; @@ -124,10 +102,6 @@ static int scmi_pm_domain_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev) scmi_pd->genpd.name = scmi_pd->name; scmi_pd->genpd.power_off = scmi_pd_power_off; scmi_pd->genpd.power_on = scmi_pd_power_on; - scmi_pd->genpd.attach_dev = scmi_pd_attach_dev; - scmi_pd->genpd.detach_dev = scmi_pd_detach_dev; - scmi_pd->genpd.flags = GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK | - GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP;
pm_genpd_init(&scmi_pd->genpd, NULL, state == SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_OFF);
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain"
This reverts commit a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain").
Using the GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK tells genpd to gate/ungate the consumer device's clock(s) during runtime suspend/resume through the PM clock API. More precisely, in genpd_runtime_resume() the clock(s) for the consumer device would become ungated prior to the driver-level ->runtime_resume() callbacks gets invoked.
This behaviour isn't a good fit for all platforms/drivers. For example, a driver may need to make some preparations of its device in its ->runtime_resume() callback, like calling clk_set_rate() before the clock(s) should be ungated. In these cases, it's easier to let the clock(s) to be managed solely by the driver, rather than at the PM domain level.
For these reasons, let's drop the use GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK for the SCMI PM domain, as to enable it to be more easily adopted across ARM platforms.
Fixes: a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain") Cc: Nicolas Pitre npitre@baylibre.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Tested-by: Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com
Thanks, Peng.
To get some more background to $subject patch, please have a look at the lore-link below.
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore. kernel.org%2Fall%2FDU0PR04MB94173B45A2CFEE3BF1BD313A88409%40D U0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cp eng.fan%40nxp.com%7C05437bc19cb14760450a08da9a3968c0%7C686ea1d 3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637991868616277658%7CUnkn own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik 1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QpQfK8lTApY qhYj80lUudQJMCujYyN9j1RNB4Q00wrM%3D&reserved=0
Kind regards Ulf Hansson
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c | 26 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c index 581d34c95769..d5dee625de78 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/pm_clock.h> #include <linux/pm_domain.h> #include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
@@ -53,27 +52,6 @@ static int scmi_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) return scmi_pd_power(domain, false); }
-static int scmi_pd_attach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *pd, struct device *dev) -{
- int ret;
- ret = pm_clk_create(dev);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = of_pm_clk_add_clks(dev);
- if (ret >= 0)
return 0;- pm_clk_destroy(dev);
- return ret;
-}
-static void scmi_pd_detach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *pd, struct device *dev) -{
- pm_clk_destroy(dev);
-}
static int scmi_pm_domain_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev) { int num_domains, i; @@ -124,10 +102,6 @@ static int scmi_pm_domain_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev) scmi_pd->genpd.name = scmi_pd->name; scmi_pd->genpd.power_off = scmi_pd_power_off; scmi_pd->genpd.power_on = scmi_pd_power_on;
scmi_pd->genpd.attach_dev = scmi_pd_attach_dev;scmi_pd->genpd.detach_dev = scmi_pd_detach_dev;scmi_pd->genpd.flags = GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK |GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP;pm_genpd_init(&scmi_pd->genpd, NULL, state == SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_OFF);
-- 2.34.1
Hi Dien, Gaku,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 02:20:33PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
This reverts commit a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain").
Using the GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK tells genpd to gate/ungate the consumer device's clock(s) during runtime suspend/resume through the PM clock API. More precisely, in genpd_runtime_resume() the clock(s) for the consumer device would become ungated prior to the driver-level ->runtime_resume() callbacks gets invoked.
This behaviour isn't a good fit for all platforms/drivers. For example, a driver may need to make some preparations of its device in its ->runtime_resume() callback, like calling clk_set_rate() before the clock(s) should be ungated. In these cases, it's easier to let the clock(s) to be managed solely by the driver, rather than at the PM domain level.
For these reasons, let's drop the use GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK for the SCMI PM domain, as to enable it to be more easily adopted across ARM platforms.
Fixes: a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain") Cc: Nicolas Pitre npitre@baylibre.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org
To get some more background to $subject patch, please have a look at the lore-link below.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR04MB94173B45A2CFEE3BF1BD313A88409@DU0PR04MB...
If you have any objections, this is your last chance to speak up before the original change gets reverted in the mainline with this patch.
Hi Ulf,
I don't have any other SCMI changes for v6.0 fixes or v6.1 I am fine if you are happy to take this via your tree or I can send it to SoC team. Let me know. I will give final one or 2 days for Renesas to get back if they really care much.
-- Regards, Sudeep
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com wrote:
Hi Dien, Gaku,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 02:20:33PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
This reverts commit a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain").
Using the GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK tells genpd to gate/ungate the consumer device's clock(s) during runtime suspend/resume through the PM clock API. More precisely, in genpd_runtime_resume() the clock(s) for the consumer device would become ungated prior to the driver-level ->runtime_resume() callbacks gets invoked.
This behaviour isn't a good fit for all platforms/drivers. For example, a driver may need to make some preparations of its device in its ->runtime_resume() callback, like calling clk_set_rate() before the clock(s) should be ungated. In these cases, it's easier to let the clock(s) to be managed solely by the driver, rather than at the PM domain level.
For these reasons, let's drop the use GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK for the SCMI PM domain, as to enable it to be more easily adopted across ARM platforms.
Fixes: a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain") Cc: Nicolas Pitre npitre@baylibre.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org
To get some more background to $subject patch, please have a look at the lore-link below.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR04MB94173B45A2CFEE3BF1BD313A88409@DU0PR04MB...
If you have any objections, this is your last chance to speak up before the original change gets reverted in the mainline with this patch.
Hi Ulf,
I don't have any other SCMI changes for v6.0 fixes or v6.1 I am fine if you are happy to take this via your tree or I can send it to SoC team. Let me know. I will give final one or 2 days for Renesas to get back if they really care much.
I have a slew of fixes for mmc that I intend to send next week, I can funnel them through that pull request.
Assuming, Renesas folkz are okay, I consider that as an ack from you, right?
Kind regards Uffe
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:46:21PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com wrote:
Hi Dien, Gaku,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 02:20:33PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
This reverts commit a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain").
Using the GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK tells genpd to gate/ungate the consumer device's clock(s) during runtime suspend/resume through the PM clock API. More precisely, in genpd_runtime_resume() the clock(s) for the consumer device would become ungated prior to the driver-level ->runtime_resume() callbacks gets invoked.
This behaviour isn't a good fit for all platforms/drivers. For example, a driver may need to make some preparations of its device in its ->runtime_resume() callback, like calling clk_set_rate() before the clock(s) should be ungated. In these cases, it's easier to let the clock(s) to be managed solely by the driver, rather than at the PM domain level.
For these reasons, let's drop the use GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK for the SCMI PM domain, as to enable it to be more easily adopted across ARM platforms.
Fixes: a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain") Cc: Nicolas Pitre npitre@baylibre.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org
To get some more background to $subject patch, please have a look at the lore-link below.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR04MB94173B45A2CFEE3BF1BD313A88409@DU0PR04MB...
If you have any objections, this is your last chance to speak up before the original change gets reverted in the mainline with this patch.
Hi Ulf,
I don't have any other SCMI changes for v6.0 fixes or v6.1 I am fine if you are happy to take this via your tree or I can send it to SoC team. Let me know. I will give final one or 2 days for Renesas to get back if they really care much.
I have a slew of fixes for mmc that I intend to send next week, I can funnel them through that pull request.
Assuming, Renesas folkz are okay, I consider that as an ack from you, right?
Yes for official reasons, here is the formal :)
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com
in case you manage to get this in via your tree.
-- Regards, Sudeep
On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 13:04, Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:46:21PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com wrote:
Hi Dien, Gaku,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 02:20:33PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
This reverts commit a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain").
Using the GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK tells genpd to gate/ungate the consumer device's clock(s) during runtime suspend/resume through the PM clock API. More precisely, in genpd_runtime_resume() the clock(s) for the consumer device would become ungated prior to the driver-level ->runtime_resume() callbacks gets invoked.
This behaviour isn't a good fit for all platforms/drivers. For example, a driver may need to make some preparations of its device in its ->runtime_resume() callback, like calling clk_set_rate() before the clock(s) should be ungated. In these cases, it's easier to let the clock(s) to be managed solely by the driver, rather than at the PM domain level.
For these reasons, let's drop the use GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK for the SCMI PM domain, as to enable it to be more easily adopted across ARM platforms.
Fixes: a3b884cef873 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock management to the SCMI power domain") Cc: Nicolas Pitre npitre@baylibre.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org
To get some more background to $subject patch, please have a look at the lore-link below.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR04MB94173B45A2CFEE3BF1BD313A88409@DU0PR04MB...
If you have any objections, this is your last chance to speak up before the original change gets reverted in the mainline with this patch.
Hi Ulf,
I don't have any other SCMI changes for v6.0 fixes or v6.1 I am fine if you are happy to take this via your tree or I can send it to SoC team. Let me know. I will give final one or 2 days for Renesas to get back if they really care much.
I have a slew of fixes for mmc that I intend to send next week, I can funnel them through that pull request.
Assuming, Renesas folkz are okay, I consider that as an ack from you, right?
Yes for official reasons, here is the formal :)
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com
Thanks!
in case you manage to get this in via your tree.
I have now queued up the patch through git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ulfh/mmc.git fixes
Let's see how it goes when it gets tested in linux-next.
-- Regards, Sudeep
Kind regards Uffe
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Peng Fan -
Sudeep Holla -
Ulf Hansson