On May 28, 2024, at 10:18 AM, Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com wrote:
On 28/05/2024 14:14, Chuck Lever III wrote:
On May 28, 2024, at 5:04 AM, Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com wrote:
On 25/05/2024 15:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:13:28AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Greg,
On 23/05/2024 14:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.160 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.160-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
...
NeilBrown neilb@suse.de nfsd: don't allow nfsd threads to be signalled.
I am seeing a suspend regression on a couple boards and bisect is pointing to the above commit. Reverting this commit does fix the issue.
Ugh, that fixes the report from others. Can you cc: everyone on that and figure out what is going on, as this keeps going back and forth...
Adding Chuck, Neil and Chris from the bug report here [0].
With the above applied to v5.15.y, I am seeing suspend on 2 of our boards fail. These boards are using NFS and on entry to suspend I am now seeing ...
Freezing of tasks failed after 20.002 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
The boards appear to hang at that point. So may be something else missing?
Note that we don't have access to hardware like this, so we haven't tested that patch (even the upstream version) with suspend on that hardware.
No problem, I would not expect you to have this particular hardware :-)
So, it could be something missing, or it could be that patch has a problem. It would help us to know if you observe the same issue with an upstream kernel, if that is possible.
I don't observe this with either mainline, -next or any other stable branch. So that would suggest that something else is missing from linux-5.15.y.
That helps. It would be very helpful to have a reproducer I can use to confirm we have a fix. I'm sure this will be a process that involves a non-trivial number of iterations.
-- Chuck Lever