Hi Paolo,
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 18:36, Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/02/20 13:53, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
[Sorry for the spam]
Greeting from Linaro ! We are running kvm-unit-tests on our CI Continuous Integration and testing on x86_64 and arm64 Juno-r2. Linux stable branches and Linux mainline and Linux next.
Few tests getting fail and skipped, we are interested in increasing the test coverage by adding required kernel config fragments, kernel command line arguments and user space tools.
The remainins SKIPs mostly depend on hardware, for example "svm" only runs on AMD machines and "pku" only on more recent Intel processors than you have.
Thanks for explaining the reason for skip.
FAIL vmx (408624 tests, 3 unexpected failures, 2 expected failures, 5 skipped)
This could be fixed in a more recent kernel.
I will keep running these tests on most recent kernels.
My two cents, OTOH, It would be great if we have monthly tag release for kvm-unit-tests.
LKFT plan to keep track of metadata / release tag version of each test suites and kernel branches and versions details.
Currently LKFT sending out kselftests results test summary on each linux-next release tag for x86_64, i386, arm and arm64 devices.
The next plan is to enable kvm-unit-tests results reporting from LKFT.
Paolo