Ping. May i request to review this email please.
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 12:48, Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote:
We (Linaro) started exploring options to run packetdrill on Linux kernel for improving network subsystem test coverage. The following results obtained on arm64 and x86_64 architectures after installing required packages on the debian rootfs. The run time of testing is less than a minute. Full run test log attached to this email.
Please suggest ways to improve the number of PASS. Our plan is to add the packetdrill test suite to LKFT [1] test plan.
arm64: Ran 234 tests: 199 passing, 35 failing, 0 timed out (36.00 sec): .
x86_64: Ran 234 tests: 192 passing, 42 failing, 0 timed out (23.14 sec): .
steps: - apt-get update - apt-get -y install build-essential python git python3 automake - apt-get -y install iproute2 net-tools ethtool bison flex - git clone https://github.com/google/packetdrill - cd packetdrill/gtests/net/packetdrill/ - ./configure - make - cd ../ - ./packetdrill/run_all.py -v -l -L
Errors list:
- error handling packet: live packet payload: expected 1000 bytes vs
actual 2000 bytes
- runtime error in socket call: Expected non-negative result but got
-1 with errno 93 (Protocol not supported)
- timing error: expected system call return at 0.300556 sec but
happened at 0.310599 sec; tolerance 0.010000 sec
- sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies: No such file
or directory - comment CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES not enabled on arm64 but set on x86_64.
- sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies: No such file
or directory
- cwnd-moderation-ecn-enter-cwr-no-moderation-700.pkt:24: error in Python code Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/code_nVK70l", line 195, in <module> assert tcpi_snd_cwnd == 4, tcpi_snd_cwnd AssertionError: 5
cwnd-moderation-ecn-enter-cwr-no-moderation-700.pkt: error executing code: '/usr/bin/python' returned non-zero status 1
[1] https://lkft.linaro.org/tests/
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org