On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 18:44, Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote:
Newer kernels (since ~v6.18-rc1) return ENOTTY instead of EINVAL when invoking ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid). Update the test to accept both EINVAL and ENOTTY as valid errors to ensure compatibility across different kernel versions.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org
Verified this on arm64, and the test passed now.
Tested-by: Anders Roxell anders.roxell@linaro.org
Cheers, Anders
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c index d20c6f074..744f7def4 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ */
/*\
- Verify that ioctl() raises an EINVAL error when PIDFD_GET_INFO is used. This
- happens when:
- Verify that ioctl() raises an EINVAL or ENOTTY (since ~v6.18-rc1) error when
- PIDFD_GET_INFO is used. This happens when:
- info parameter is NULL
- info parameter is providing the wrong size
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include "tst_test.h" #include "lapi/pidfd.h" #include "lapi/sched.h" +#include <errno.h> #include "ioctl_pidfd.h"
struct pidfd_info_invalid { @@ -43,7 +44,12 @@ static void run(void) exit(0);
TST_EXP_FAIL(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO, NULL), EINVAL);
TST_EXP_FAIL(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid), EINVAL);
/* Expect ioctl to fail; accept either EINVAL or ENOTTY (~v6.18-rc1) */int exp_errnos[] = {EINVAL, ENOTTY};TST_EXP_FAIL_ARR(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid),exp_errnos, ARRAY_SIZE(exp_errnos)); SAFE_CLOSE(pidfd);}
2.43.0