On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 02:12, Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com wrote:
[Please ignore this if it is already reported]
Linux next 20210813 tag s390 build failed with gcc-8 but pass with gcc-9 and gcc-10.
s390 (defconfig) with gcc-8 FAILED s390 (defconfig) with gcc-9 PASS s390 (defconfig) with gcc-10 PASS
Build error: ----------- s390x-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-mfentry'; did you mean '--entry'? make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:272: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1 s390x-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-mfentry'; did you mean '--entry'? make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:118: scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s] Error 1 make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Build log, https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1wfNcaYbsp29k3RvYuPXzxrM4vs/
metadata: -------- git_describe: next-20210813 git_repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next git_short_log: 4b358aabb93a (\Add linux-next specific files for 20210813) target_arch: s390 toolchain: gcc-8
Steps to reproduce: ------------------- # TuxMake is a command line tool and Python library that provides # portable and repeatable Linux kernel builds across a variety of # architectures, toolchains, kernel configurations, and make targets. # # TuxMake supports the concept of runtimes. # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/runtimes/, for that to work it requires # that you install podman or docker on your system. # # To install tuxmake on your system globally: # sudo pip3 install -U tuxmake # # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/ for complete documentation.
tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch s390 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig defconfig
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 4:02 AM Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote:
Thanks for the report. Andrew has dropped the patch from mm-next. Looks like it's too soon to remove build configuration tests for -mfentry.
Hi all,
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:37:23 -0700 Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com wrote:
I have removed that patch from linux-next today as well.