This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.10-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.9.10-rc1
Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com ACPI: GED: fix -Wformat
David Edmondson david.edmondson@oracle.com KVM: x86: clflushopt should be treated as a no-op by emulation
Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix Add BW copypasta
Qian Cai cai@redhat.com powerpc/smp: Call rcu_cpu_starting() earlier
Tommi Rantala tommi.t.rantala@nokia.com selftests/harness: prettify SKIP message whitespace again
Zhang Changzhong zhangchangzhong@huawei.com can: proc: can_remove_proc(): silence remove_proc_entry warning
Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com mac80211: always wind down STA state
Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Input: sunkbd - avoid use-after-free in teardown paths
Gabriel David ultracoolguy@tutanota.com leds: lm3697: Fix out-of-bound access
Daniel Axtens dja@axtens.net selftests/powerpc: entry flush test
Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au powerpc: Only include kup-radix.h for 64-bit Book3S
Nicholas Piggin npiggin@gmail.com powerpc/64s: flush L1D after user accesses
Nicholas Piggin npiggin@gmail.com powerpc/64s: flush L1D on kernel entry
Russell Currey ruscur@russell.cc selftests/powerpc: rfi_flush: disable entry flush if present
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 7 + Makefile | 4 +- arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h | 66 ++++--- arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h | 12 +- arch/powerpc/include/asm/feature-fixups.h | 19 ++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h | 26 ++- arch/powerpc/include/asm/security_features.h | 7 + arch/powerpc/include/asm/setup.h | 4 + arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 80 +++++---- arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 122 ++++++++++++- arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 14 ++ arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c | 104 +++++++++++ arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c | 17 ++ arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 8 + arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 8 +- drivers/acpi/evged.c | 2 +- drivers/input/keyboard/sunkbd.c | 41 ++++- drivers/leds/leds-lm3697.c | 8 +- net/can/proc.c | 6 +- net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 18 ++ tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/powerpc/security/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/Makefile | 2 +- .../selftests/powerpc/security/entry_flush.c | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/powerpc/security/rfi_flush.c | 35 +++- 28 files changed, 719 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:03:38 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.10-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.9: 15 builds: 15 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 64 tests: 64 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.9.10-rc1-g861b379f0883 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:56:34PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:03:38 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.10-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.9: 15 builds: 15 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 64 tests: 64 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.9.10-rc1-g861b379f0883 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
gre gk-
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 12:03 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.10-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux- stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
hello,
Compiled and booted 5.9.10-rc1+. No issues with "dmesg -l err" But "dmesg -l warn" shows something.
file dmesg-warn-nov-20-2020-portion.txt is attached
Tested-by: Jeffrin Jose T jeffrin@rajagiritech.edu.in
-- software engineer rajagiri school of engineering and technology - autonomous
On 11/20/20 4:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.10-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:27:28PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 11/20/20 4:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.10-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 16:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.10-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.9.10-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.9.y git commit: 861b379f08830cebd80999babf94973e831999c2 git describe: v5.9.9-15-g861b379f0883 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.9.y/build/v5.9.9-...
No regressions (compared to build v5.9.9)
No fixes (compared to build v5.9.9)
Ran 49372 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - nxp-ls2088 - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan
Test Suites ----------- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * network-basic-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * kunit * kselftest
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 04:42:45PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 16:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.10-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Thanks for testing them all and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:03:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 426 pass: 426 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 10:38:17AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:03:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.10 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 426 pass: 426 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Thanks for the testing. I'll leave the powerpc build failures in as the issue being fixed is better to have at the moment. Hopefully the ppc developers can fix those up soon.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jeffrin Jose T -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Shuah Khan