Following build warnings / errors noticed on Linux next-20240429 tag on the arm64, arm and riscv with gcc-8 and gcc-13 builds pass.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Commit id: b58a0bc904ff nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support
Buids: -- gcc-8-arm64-defconfig - Fail gcc-8-arm-defconfig - Fail gcc-8-riscv-defconfig - Fail
Build log: ---- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c: In function 'build_registry': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1266:3: error: label at end of compound statement default: ^~~~~~~ make[7]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.o] Error 1
metadata: git_describe: next-20240429 git_repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next git_short_log: b0a2c79c6f35 ("Add linux-next specific files for 20240429") arch: arm64, arm, riscv toolchain: gcc-8
Steps to reproduce: ---- # tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig defconfig
Links: - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2flcoOuqVJfhTvX4AOYsW... - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240429/tes... - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240429/tes...
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On 29.04.24 17:06, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
Following build warnings / errors noticed on Linux next-20240429 tag on the arm64, arm and riscv with gcc-8 and gcc-13 builds pass.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Commit id: b58a0bc904ff nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support
Buids:
gcc-8-arm64-defconfig - Fail gcc-8-arm-defconfig - Fail gcc-8-riscv-defconfig - Fail
Build log:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c: In function 'build_registry': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1266:3: error: label at end of compound statement default: ^~~~~~~ make[7]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.o] Error 1
TWIMC, there is another report about this in this thread (sadly some of its post did not make it to lore):
https://lore.kernel.org/all/162ef3c0-1d7b-4220-a21f-b0008657f8a5@redhat.com/
Ciao, Thorsten
metadata: git_describe: next-20240429 git_repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next git_short_log: b0a2c79c6f35 ("Add linux-next specific files for 20240429") arch: arm64, arm, riscv toolchain: gcc-8
Steps to reproduce:
# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig defconfig
Links:
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2flcoOuqVJfhTvX4AOYsW...
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240429/tes...
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240429/tes...
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 17:30 +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
TWIMC, there is another report about this in this thread (sadly some of its post did not make it to lore):
https://lore.kernel.org/all/162ef3c0-1d7b-4220-a21f-b0008657f8a5@redhat.com/
Ciao, Thorsten
This doesn't fail on x86-64 when I build it. I also did a cross-compile to arm64 with the arm64 defconfig, and it doesn't fail there either.
I'm guessing this is a compiler version thing. I'm using gcc 11.4. Is that just too old?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024, at 19:08, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 17:30 +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
TWIMC, there is another report about this in this thread (sadly some of its post did not make it to lore):
https://lore.kernel.org/all/162ef3c0-1d7b-4220-a21f-b0008657f8a5@redhat.com/
Ciao, Thorsten
This doesn't fail on x86-64 when I build it. I also did a cross-compile to arm64 with the arm64 defconfig, and it doesn't fail there either.
I'm guessing this is a compiler version thing. I'm using gcc 11.4. Is that just too old?
It's too new: this is valid syntax in c23 and accepted by newer compilers as an extension to gnu11, but older versions don't like it.
gcc-11 and clang-16 are fine, while gcc-10 and clang-15 as well as earlier versions produce this warning.
Arnd