stable-rc 4.9.190-rc1/d76762160740: no regressions found in project stable v4.9.y on OE - sanity
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 4.9.190-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: d7676216074048058927540b6b7e413f4e909c0a git describe: v4.9.189-94-gd76762160740 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe-sanity/build/v4.9....
No regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
No fixes (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
Boards, architectures and test suites: -------------------------------------
dragonboard-410c * build - fail: 1,
hi6220-hikey * build - fail: 1,
i386 * build - fail: 1,
juno-r2 - arm64 * build - fail: 1,
x15 - arm * build - fail: 1,
x86_64 * build - fail: 1,
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 08:33:09PM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.9.190-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: d7676216074048058927540b6b7e413f4e909c0a git describe: v4.9.189-94-gd76762160740 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe-sanity/build/v4.9....
No regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
No fixes (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
Boards, architectures and test suites:
dragonboard-410c
- build - fail: 1,
hi6220-hikey
- build - fail: 1,
i386
- build - fail: 1,
juno-r2 - arm64
- build - fail: 1,
x15 - arm
- build - fail: 1,
x86_64
- build - fail: 1,
Everything is failing to build and this is not a regression????
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 09:46, Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 08:33:09PM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.9.190-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: d7676216074048058927540b6b7e413f4e909c0a git describe: v4.9.189-94-gd76762160740 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe-sanity/build/v4.9....
No regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
No fixes (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
Boards, architectures and test suites:
dragonboard-410c
- build - fail: 1,
Everything is failing to build and this is not a regression????
No regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65) * previous But Regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-69-g711554dc8b12) ** previous of previous
This email generated by system which is comparing with previous build which was also a failure.
- Naresh
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:12:18AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 09:46, Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 08:33:09PM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.9.190-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: d7676216074048058927540b6b7e413f4e909c0a git describe: v4.9.189-94-gd76762160740 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe-sanity/build/v4.9....
No regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
No fixes (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
Boards, architectures and test suites:
dragonboard-410c
- build - fail: 1,
Everything is failing to build and this is not a regression????
No regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65) * previous But Regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-69-g711554dc8b12) ** previous of previous
This email generated by system which is comparing with previous build which was also a failure.
Any way to flag "failures" a bit more "loud"? The original build issue totally got lost in the noise.
Look at the red hat emails to the stable list, a nice big red X is kind of obvious as to something going wrong :)
In fact, that's what clued me into looking at these reports to see that it had been failing everywhere.
Oh, and the kernelci reports of "everything failed" also got my attention...
thanks,
greg k-h
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 07:08:47AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:12:18AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 09:46, Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 08:33:09PM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.9.190-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: d7676216074048058927540b6b7e413f4e909c0a git describe: v4.9.189-94-gd76762160740 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe-sanity/build/v4.9....
No regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
No fixes (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65)
Boards, architectures and test suites:
dragonboard-410c
- build - fail: 1,
Everything is failing to build and this is not a regression????
No regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-84-gfe210ed24b65) * previous But Regressions (compared to build v4.9.189-69-g711554dc8b12) ** previous of previous
This email generated by system which is comparing with previous build which was also a failure.
Any way to flag "failures" a bit more "loud"? The original build issue totally got lost in the noise.
Look at the red hat emails to the stable list, a nice big red X is kind of obvious as to something going wrong :)
In fact, that's what clued me into looking at these reports to see that it had been failing everywhere.
Oh, and the kernelci reports of "everything failed" also got my attention...
Sorry Greg, we know this is a big gap.
I do love that you love CKI's emoji. Be careful what you wish for 😇
I'm giving a talk at Connect about where LKFT needs to go with reporting, and I'm scoping out work to improve it. I'll talk to Milosz and the rest of the SQUAD team, which generates these reports, to see if there is anything we can do in the short term to improve the subject lines when there are obvious (to humans) problems like this.
Dan
thanks,
greg k-h
-
Dan Rue -
Greg KH -
Linaro QA -
Naresh Kamboju