> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:48:30AM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
>> Summary
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> kernel: 4.4.92
>> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> git branch: linux-4.4.y
>> git commit: 69f53f5d37d53ba17ca744947226b4cdadb90c13
>> git describe: v4.4.92
>> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.92
>>
>> Regressions (compared to build v4.4.91-48-gc0489dd5896d)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> x15 - arm:
>> ltp-syscalls-tests:
>> * fcntl36
>>
>> * test src: git://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git
>
> Hm, what does this mean? Did this regress due to a breakage of your
> system, as this link:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.92/tes…
> shows all "No log available for this test" :(
No test logs are expected with current status of qa-reports.
We have complete log for ltp syscalls runs in a single file and work
in progress for split logs for each test case.
Here is the log for the failure test case.
fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD read lock vs OFD write lock
fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized
fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD write lock vs POSIX write lock
fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized
fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD read lock vs POSIX write lock
fcntl36.c:205: FAIL: Unexpected data offset 12304 value 9
fcntl36.c:205: FAIL: Unexpected data offset 13568 value 47
fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD write lock vs POSIX read lock
fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized
fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD write lock vs OFD write lock
fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized
fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD r/w lock vs POSIX write lock
fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized
fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD r/w lock vs POSIX read lock
fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized
Summary:
passed 6
failed 2
skipped 0
warnings 0
Linux version 4.4.92 (buildslave@x86-64-08) (gcc version 6.2.1
20161016 (Linaro GCC 6.2-2016.11) ) #1 SMP Thu Oct 12 10:59:44 UTC
2017
LAVA job id:
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/46680#L2847
Bug reported for this failure please refer this link.
LKFT: 4.4: X15: LTP syscall test case fcntl36.c:205: FAIL: Unexpected
data offset 12304 value 9
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3339
This bug is not consistence,
I have re tested fcntl36.
1. test PASS in independent run "./fcntl36"
2. test FAIL with "strace ./fcntl36"
Re-tested log,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/47795#L904
Pastebin log for above case if you do not like full boot log.
https://pastebin.com/XWuSDaMe
- Naresh
>
> confused.
>
> greg k-h