Hi All,
Please discard latest 4 QA LKFT reports as they don't reflect a recent
change made by QA aiming to normalize naming convention of the LKFT builds
and Kernel tree repos which changed URLs, hence looking broken now.
The new convention is:
<<kernel repo>>-<<kernel-tree>>[-<<kernel version>>]-<<OS>>
QA will resend those reports once this issue is fixed to reflect new names.
For more info about the new name changes here
<https://review.linaro.org/#/c/20807/> is the review.
Thanks
Hi Greg,
On 26 July 2017 at 00:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.79 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu Jul 27 19:16:34 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
For ARM64, with hikey patches merged, built and boot tested on the
hikey. No regressions noted.
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.79-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Best regards,
Sumit.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:03:00PM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
>
> Tests: 1107
I wonder if folks would benefit from having the number of regressions
listed here above the total number of failures. The subject line as
well perhaps, mentioning the number of new failures since the last
ancestor, instead of the total number of failures?
In this case it says there are 12 failures but most of them have never
passed. This makes for an unnecessarily ominous looking report header
and may initially mislead some folks. Most people I imagine just want to
know if they broke something.
> Failed: 12
> Passed: 1092
> Build: next-20170725
> Details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next/build/next-20170725
>
> series: lkft
> kernel-config: https://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/morty/hikey/rpb/linux-next/7…
> build-url: https://ci.linaro.org/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-next/DISTRO=rpb,MACHINE=h…
> kernel-branch: master
> kernel-describe: next-20170725
> kernel-commit: dce9071ab691f33b2e7e9af142cf95e5ec7cd217
> job_status: Complete
Can the job_status line be removed? I'm guessing it'll always say
complete.
thanks,
steve
Hi Greg,
On 19 July 2017 at 16:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.78 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri Jul 21 11:12:31 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build and boot-tested for arm64 (with Hikey-patches) on hikey; no
regressions noted.
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.78-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Best,
Sumit.
Hi Greg,
On 13 July 2017 at 21:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.77 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat Jul 15 15:39:40 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.77-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
For hikey, built- and boot-tested with arm64 defconfig (and hikey
additional patches); no regressions noted.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Best,
Sumit.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:03:02AM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
More feedback on these...
One thing I just noticed is that the reports are being sent to every
recipient individually. This is really bad because it breaks up the
discussion, if someone replies it won't go to everyone who got the
original report which increases confusion and leads to duplication of
work.
> Details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/hikey-mainline-rebase-4.4.x/build/f5ec4f…
The web part of things doesn't seem to have any way of getting to logs.
It'd be good to at least have links to the LAVA jobs as a placeholder
for now.
> kernel-describe: v3.19-rc7-71416-gf5ec4ff
This is obvious nonsense, this is v4.4 based not v3.19 based. I suspect
that this can be fixed by adding Linus' tree as a remote to the git tree
used to generate these and keeping it up to date.
> format: Lava-Test Test Definition 1.0
Do we need this in the e-mail? It doesn't seem relevant.
> description: Dummy tests
...
> name: dummy-tests
Having the description before the name seems kind of odd, as does them
not being adjacent.
However looking at the test counts and comparing with the web interface
it seems like this isn't actually the results for a single testsuite but
rather the collected results for all the testsuites that were run for
this tree. If that's the case then probably this can just be removed
but then...
> Failures
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> hi6220-hikey:
>
> * test_lru_map
...when we list test results we should probably say which testsuite they
are from...
> | kselftest/test_maps | | fail |
...as is done in some parts of the reports.
Hi Greg,
On 27 June 2017 at 18:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.75 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu Jun 29 12:45:11 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.75-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
merged with hikey branches, and build and boot-tested OK on hikey. No
regressions noted.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Best,
Sumit.
Will you all PLEASE stop automatically signing this email address
(gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org) up to this list? This is the second time
you have done this.
Either stop cc:ing me on stuff sent to this list (as you seem to want to
do for some odd reason), or just allow anyone to post to it or something
else.
You all know better than to EVER sign someone up for a mailing list who
has not done so.
greg 'getting very grumpy' k-h
----- Forwarded message from lts-dev-request(a)lists.linaro.org -----
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:01:34 +0000
From: lts-dev-request(a)lists.linaro.org
To: gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Welcome to the "Lts-dev" mailing list
Welcome to the Lts-dev(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list! Welcome to the
Long Term Support Mailing list for the Linux Kernel. Point of the list
is technical discussion and general coordination for those interested
in patches for LTS.
To post to this list, send your message to:
lts-dev(a)lists.linaro.org
General information about the mailing list is at:
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lts-dev
If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to
or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your
subscription page at:
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/options/lts-dev/gregkh%40linuxfoundation.o…
You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to:
Lts-dev-request(a)lists.linaro.org
with the word `help' in the subject or body (don't include the
quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions.
You must know your password to change your options (including changing
the password, itself) or to unsubscribe without confirmation. It is:
etvozioz
Normally, Mailman will remind you of your lists.linaro.org mailing
list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you
prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to
unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on
your options page that will email your current password to you.
----- End forwarded message -----
Hi Greg,
On 19 June 2017 at 20:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.74 release.
> There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Jun 21 15:20:21 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.74-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Built and boot tested on hikey with arm64 defconfig, no regressions noted.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Best,
Sumit.
Hi Greg,
On 16 June 2017 at 06:09, Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> wrote:
> On 06/15/2017 10:52 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.73 release.
>> There are 46 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Sat Jun 17 17:51:59 UTC 2017.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>
> Build results:
> total: 145 pass: 145 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 115 pass: 115 fail: 0
>
> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.
>
> Guenter
>
Defconfig built and boot-tested on Hikey; no regressions noted.
Best,
Sumit.
Hi Greg,
(Limiting this to lts-dev, till we formalize the hikey+LTS process)
On 5 June 2017 at 21:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.71 release.
> There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Jun 7 15:30:23 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build tested OK with hikey-4.4 snapshot merged with the above series.
No regressions noted.
(I will notify further after a boot test this morning).
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
Hi Greg,
For your consideration following upstream patches taken from lede
source tree[1] targeted for 4.9.y.
09f3510 (ARM: BCM5301X: Add back handler ignoring external)
5d1f2d2 (ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Set 5 GHz wireless frequency limits)
0c2bf9f (ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Correct GIC_PPI interrupt flags)
6e347b5 (PCI: iproc: Save host bridge window resource in struct)
6c356ed (MIPS: Lantiq: Fix cascaded IRQ setup)
e247454 (i2c: bcm2835: Fix hang for writing messages larger than 16 bytes)
d4030d7 (i2c: bcm2835: Protect against unexpected TXW/RXR interrupts)
23c9540 (i2c: bcm2835: Use dev_dbg logging on transfer errors)
8d2cc5cc (i2c: bcm2835: Can't support I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK)
155e8b3 (clk: bcm: Support rate change propagation on bcm2835 clocks)
d86d46a (clk: bcm: Allow rate change propagation to PLLH_AUX on VEC clock)
2aab7a2 (clk: bcm: Fix 'maybe-uninitialized' warning in
bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate())
5548609 (clk: bcm2835: Don't rate change PLLs on behalf of DSI PLL dividers.)
8a39e9f (clk: bcm2835: Register the DSI0/DSI1 pixel clocks.)
3f91958 (clk: bcm2835: Add leaf clock measurement support, disabled by default)
2201ac6 (dmaengine: bcm2835: Fix cyclic DMA period splitting)
cd4b1e3 (usb: dwc2: Remove unnecessary kfree)
bd5d213 (mtd: bcm47xxpart: fix parsing first block after aligned TRX)
40be0dd (net: add devm version of alloc_etherdev_mqs function)
34a5102 (net: bgmac: allocate struct bgmac just once & don't copy it)
aa8863e (net: bgmac: drop struct bcma_mdio we don't need anymore)
3ec7544 (of: Add check to of_scan_flat_dt() before accessing
initial_boot_params)
7272416 (rt2500usb: don't mark register accesses as inline)
f4737a6 (brcmfmac: check brcmf_bus_get_memdump result for error)
36401cb (brcmfmac: be more verbose when PSM's watchdog fires)
9587a01 (brcmfmac: merge two brcmf_err macros into one)
087fa71 (brcmfmac: switch to C function (__brcmf_err) for printing errors)
d063055 (brcmfmac: merge two remaining brcmf_err macros)
93c7018 (rt2x00usb: do not anchor rx and tx urb's)
0488a61 (rt2x00usb: fix anchor initialization)
91b6328 (brcmfmac: Use net_device_stats from struct net_device)
a083c8f (rt2x00: Fix incorrect usage of CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB_USB)
6232c17 (rt2x00: avoid introducing a USB dependency in the rt2x00lib module)
Cherry-picked and build tested on Linux 4.9.20 for
ARCH=arm/arm64/i386/x86_64 + allmodconfig.
Regards,
Amit Pundir
[1] https://github.com/lede-project/source. These patches are mostly
cherry-picked from target/linux/*/patches-4.9 directories. Though some
are also put in package/kernel/*/patches/ directory.
Hi Greg, all,
Just a status: so I went through about 200+ patches since the last
patch list I sent; out of which 16 have been sent out to stable just
now.
8 listed below might be interesting but either don't apply easily or
need more understanding - if anyone finds them worthy for more time, I
can spend some, otherwise will drop them from my list
hv_netvsc: Add query for initial physical link speed
hv_netvsc: Add handler for physical link speed change
hv_netvsc: Implement batching of receive completions
netvsc: fix checksum on UDP IPV6
netvsc: Remove mistaken udp.h inclusion.
mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more
mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocation
kvm: x86: correctly reset dest_map->vector when restoring LAPIC state
Best,
Sumit.
--
Thanks and regards,
Sumit Semwal
Linaro Mobile Group - Kernel Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs