- Lts-dev - lists.linaro.org

4.4.94-rc1/64eacf43: no regressions found in project lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe

by Linaro QA

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 4.4.94-rc1 git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git git tag: 4.4.94-rc1-hikey-20171019 git commit: 64eacf43d6ff4c9320737af2fe207e5711010f1f git describe: 4.4.94-rc1-hikey-20171019 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.… No regressions (compared to build 4.4.93-rc1-hikey-20171016) Boards, architectures and test suites: ------------------------------------- hi6220-hikey - arm64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 32, skip: 9, fail: 13 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 27, skip: 36, fail: 18 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 59, fail: 2 * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 21, skip: 1, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 980, skip: 125, fail: 4 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports -- Linaro QA (beta) https://qa-reports.linaro.org

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

4.9.58-rc1/f7dffe80: regressions detected in project lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe

by Linaro QA

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 4.9.58-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: f7dffe80de67452121ead836270463be60131376 git describe: v4.9.57-52-gf7dffe80de67 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.57-52-… Regressions (compared to build v4.9.57) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ x15 - arm: kselftest: * raw_skew * test src: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.13.tar.xz Boards, architectures and test suites: ------------------------------------- hi6220-hikey - arm64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 38, skip: 8, fail: 7 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 79, fail: 2 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 59, fail: 2 * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 21, skip: 1, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 985, skip: 122, fail: 2 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, juno-r2 - arm64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 37, skip: 6, fail: 7 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 79, fail: 2 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 59, fail: 2 * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 943, skip: 156, fail: 13 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, x15 - arm * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 36, skip: 1, fail: 16 * libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 63, fail: 18 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60, * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - fail: 22 * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 13, skip: 1, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 1040, skip: 67, fail: 2 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 11, fail: 2 dell-poweredge-r200 - x86_64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 53, fail: 15 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 76, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 63, fail: 18 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 61, * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 1, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 13, skip: 1, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 963, skip: 163, fail: 11 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports -- Linaro QA (beta) https://qa-reports.linaro.org

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

4.4.92/f26ce501: no regressions found in project lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.4-oe

by Linaro QA

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 4.4.92 git repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/hikey-linaro git branch: android-hikey-linaro-4.4 git commit: f26ce5018d98da248eb149f2d3067a92186989e1 git describe: v4.4.92-568342-gf26ce5018d98 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.9… No regressions (compared to build v4.4.91-568330-g4fe81adcc500) Boards, architectures and test suites: ------------------------------------- hi6220-hikey - arm64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 31, fail: 23 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 79, fail: 2 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 61, * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 21, skip: 1, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 993, skip: 113, fail: 3 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports -- Linaro QA (beta) https://qa-reports.linaro.org

7 years, 6 months

5
5
0 0

4.9.57/5d7a76ac: no regressions found in project lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe

by Linaro QA

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 4.9.57 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.9.y git commit: 5d7a76acad403638f635c918cc63d1d44ffa4065 git describe: v4.9.57 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.57 No regressions (compared to build v4.9.56-40-gc3202b1cbbb1) Boards, architectures and test suites: ------------------------------------- hi6220-hikey - arm64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 38, skip: 1, fail: 15 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 79, fail: 2 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 59, fail: 2 * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 21, skip: 1, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 985, skip: 122, fail: 2 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, juno-r2 - arm64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 38, skip: 1, fail: 15 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 79, fail: 2 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 59, fail: 2 * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 943, skip: 156, fail: 13 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, x15 - arm * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 37, skip: 1, fail: 15 * libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 63, fail: 18 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60, * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - fail: 22 * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 13, skip: 1, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 1040, skip: 67, fail: 2 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 11, fail: 2 dell-poweredge-r200 - x86_64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 52, fail: 15 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 76, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 63, fail: 18 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 61, skip: 1, * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 21, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 8, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 13, skip: 1, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 963, skip: 163, fail: 11 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports -- Linaro QA (beta) https://qa-reports.linaro.org

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Getting to a clean baseline with mainline

by Tom Gall

Hi All, I’m looking at the 4.14-rc5 results. I think it’s important that we establish clear green baselines so we can detect regressions. Universally I think we want to get stuff on skip lists and then get after those skip lists working on fixes. As that happens, we basically get those fixes back ported to 4.9 and 4.4. I haven’t captured everything since this requires manual c/n/p: (Being able to do command line queries would be really awesome) With the triage meeting tomorrow I’d like to focus down in these areas. x86_64 ltp-syscalls-tests - How much of this caused by NFS? Why are we still using NFS? linkat01 open12 openat02 renameat201 renameat202 sendfile09 sendfile09_64 utime01 utime02 utime06 utimes01 ltp_containers - looks like arm64 is in better shape? Did something not get replicated on x86? netns_breakns_ip_ipv4_ioctl netns_breakns_ip_ipv4_netlink netns_breakns_ip_ipv6_ioctl netns_breakns_ip_ipv6_netlink netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv4_ioc netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv4_net netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv6_ioc netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv6_net netns_comm_ip_ipv4_ioctl netns_comm_ip_ipv4_netlink netns_comm_ip_ipv6_ioctl netns_comm_ip_ipv6_netlink netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv4_ioctl netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv4_netlin netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv6_ioctl netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv6_netlin netns_sysfs kselftest ftracetest - fixed in kselftest-next pstore_tests - extra command line options needed run_fuse_test.sh - fixed for ARM run.sh run_vmtests test_align test_kmod.sh test_progs test_verifier HiKey quotactl01 - still missing quota quota_remount_test01 ltp-containers is better but…. : netns_comm_ip_ipv6_ioctl netns_comm_ip_ipv6_netlink netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv6_ioctl netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv6_netlin netns_sysfs kselftest breakpoint_test_arm64 ftracetest pstore_tests run_fuse_test.sh run.sh run_vmtests seccomp_bpf test_align test_kmod.sh test_maps test_progs test_verifier Juno ltp-syscall - looks like all NFS related? when can we dump NFS? open12 openat02 quotactl01 renameat201 renameat202 sendfile09 sendfile09_64 utime01 utime02 utime06 utimensat01 utimes01 quota_remount_test01 - missing quota ltp-containers - same problems as on Hikey netns_comm_ip_ipv6_ioctl netns_comm_ip_ipv6_netlink netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv6_ioctl netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv6_netlin netns_sysfs x15 perf_event_open02 quotactl01 leapsec_timer 22 failures in ltp-hugetlbfs - I thought we agreed we were going to put it on our skip list for now ltp-containers-test 18 failures — looks to be same as intel It’s a long list but feels like with a fix or two in the test environment we could have a number of failures switch to green.

7 years, 6 months

6
20
0 0

Adding coverage

by Tom Gall

This past RC cycle I think we exposed a weakness in what we have in LKFT where the ability to execute some key functional stacks in the system to drive the kernel would probably be useful for validation. The networking bug involving dhclient for example. So what if we used either Debian, Gentoo or akin that has a mechanism that has as part of it’s packaging system a test target for each package. Simplest build a package, runs ‘make test’ (or akin) for some key packages that exercises parts of the system that should help tickle the kernel in interesting ways to tease out regressions. Thus wouldn’t work on modest boards but the socionext or Juno boards could probably work fine. Thoughts? Regards, Tom

7 years, 6 months

9
19
0 0

4.9.56/53d9fca9: no regressions found in project lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-oe

by Linaro QA

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 4.9.56 git repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/hikey-linaro git branch: android-hikey-linaro-4.9 git commit: 53d9fca91a9ca92bee17681970747fb9ace7a570 git describe: v4.9.56-638520-g53d9fca91a9c Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.5… No regressions (compared to build v4.9.54-638511-gb9f583e4d82a) Boards, architectures and test suites: ------------------------------------- hi6220-hikey - arm64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 38, skip: 1, fail: 15 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 79, fail: 2 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 61, * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 21, skip: 1, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 997, skip: 112, * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports -- Linaro QA (beta) https://qa-reports.linaro.org

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

4.4.92/059bce54: no regressions found in project lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-4.4-oe

by Linaro QA

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 4.4.92 git repo: https://git.linaro.org/people/sumit.semwal/linux-lts.git git tag: 4.4.92-hikey git commit: 059bce543290d178c9d80d0430fbb7bfc983db5c git describe: 4.4.92-hikey Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-4.4-oe/build/4.4.92-… No regressions (compared to build 4.4.91-hikey) Boards, architectures and test suites: ------------------------------------- hi6220-hikey - arm64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - pass: 32, skip: 1, fail: 21 * libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 27, skip: 36, fail: 18 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 59, fail: 2 * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 21, skip: 1, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 980, skip: 125, fail: 4 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13, Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports -- Linaro QA (beta) https://qa-reports.linaro.org

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

4.4.92/69f53f5d: regressions detected in project lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe

by Linaro QA

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 4.4.92 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.4.y git commit: 69f53f5d37d53ba17ca744947226b4cdadb90c13 git describe: v4.4.92 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.92 Regressions (compared to build v4.4.91-48-gc0489dd5896d) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ x15 - arm: ltp-syscalls-tests: * fcntl36 * test src: git://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git Boards, architectures and test suites: ------------------------------------- juno-r2 - arm64 * boot - pass: 20 * kselftest - skip: 1, fail: 21, pass: 32 * libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90 * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-containers-tests - skip: 36, fail: 18, pass: 27 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-fs-tests - skip: 1, fail: 2, pass: 59 * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19 * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22 * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3 * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9 * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11 * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4 * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14 * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13 x15 - arm * boot - pass: 20 * kselftest - skip: 1, fail: 20, pass: 32 * libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-containers-tests - fail: 18, pass: 63 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-fs-tests - skip: 1, fail: 2, pass: 59 * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19 * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-hugetlb-tests - fail: 22, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3 * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9 * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11 * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4 * ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13 * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4 * ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 69, fail: 5, pass: 1036 dell-poweredge-r200 - x86_64 * boot - pass: 20 * kselftest - fail: 24, pass: 42 * libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 76 * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-containers-tests - fail: 18, pass: 63 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-fs-tests - skip: 1, pass: 61 * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19 * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22 * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3 * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9 * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11 * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2 * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4 * ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13 * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4 * ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 164, fail: 13, pass: 960 * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13 Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports -- Linaro QA (beta) https://qa-reports.linaro.org

7 years, 6 months

5
8
0 0

No tests run for 4.9.55-rc1 that found errors?

by Greg KH

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 09:44:36AM +0000, Linaro QA wrote: > Summary > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > kernel: 4.9.54 > git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > git branch: linux-4.9.y > git commit: f37eb7b586f1dd24a86c50278c65322fc6787722 > git describe: v4.9.54 > Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.54 Hm, I don't seem to have a test result here for 4.9.55-rc1, so I'm hijacking this thread to ask what happened to the tests there? Turns out that 4.9.55-rc1 did not work at all for networking, yet no tests seem to have caught it. Are we not testing something with a network here? You said you were using NFS, how did that work? Anything we can do to add to the tests to verify that basic dhcp works? We should learn from our mistakes... Heck, the simple build/boot tests that Google runs instantly found this issue when I tried to merge 4.9.55 into the android-common trees, maybe I should just rely on thost tests from now on? Because of this, I had to release 4.9.56 a few hours later fixing the issue. This doesn't make me feel like I can trust this testing effort at all just yet, given the track record it has shown this past week. We have had two known-bad kernel releases and none of this testing caught it at all (both were caught by community members...) :( Back to booting the kernels on my laptop and running 'make allmodconfig', that's found more errors so far than anything else... greg k-h

7 years, 6 months

5
8
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Lts-dev