On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:03:00PM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Tests: 1107
I wonder if folks would benefit from having the number of regressions listed here above the total number of failures. The subject line as well perhaps, mentioning the number of new failures since the last ancestor, instead of the total number of failures?
In this case it says there are 12 failures but most of them have never passed. This makes for an unnecessarily ominous looking report header and may initially mislead some folks. Most people I imagine just want to know if they broke something.
Failed: 12 Passed: 1092 Build: next-20170725 Details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next/build/next-20170725
series: lkft kernel-config: https://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/morty/hikey/rpb/linux-next/73... build-url: https://ci.linaro.org/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-next/DISTRO=rpb,MACHINE=hi... kernel-branch: master kernel-describe: next-20170725 kernel-commit: dce9071ab691f33b2e7e9af142cf95e5ec7cd217 job_status: Complete
Can the job_status line be removed? I'm guessing it'll always say complete.
thanks, steve