On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 08:34:48AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Hi Steve, Greg,
On Sep 8, 2017 02:41, "Steve Muckle" smuckle.linux@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/07/2017 12:28 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: On 7 September 2017 at 22:10, Greg KH <gregkh@google.com> wrote: And finally, why are you testing x86, what happened to the ARM platforms? Beagle X15 is being added to the lab. The results should be available soon. I think Greg may be referring to ARM[32/64] in general (Greg please correct me if not)? This is now just listing regressions from past test results, so I'm assuming that if there are no regressions for a particular architecture, that architecture will not be listed. But having said that, I clicked on Test details and didn't see hikey tested. There's one kernel config listed in the metadata which is x86-specific, so I'm confused...Sorry, 4.4.y is a 'special' case wrt Hikey: since Hikey support wasn't merged until later, to test LTS-4.4, we have a hikey-merged-4.4.h which results into another test run called linaro-hikey-stable-4.4-oe (likewise for -rc).
That's why, this particular test build only tests x86 at the moment.
I know it is a bit confusing, but keeping a 'vanilla' stable-4.4 setup allows us a comparison benchmark for each run.
Will we ever get a "vanilla" setup for 4.4 kernels on a non-x86 system? And given the past failures of tests on arm64 only, it's not that good of a comparison benchmark :)
How about for 4.9? 4.14?
thanks,
greg k-h