On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:03:01PM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
• Tests: 0 • Failed: 0 • Passed: 0
Yeah, nothing happened!!!
:(
• Build: v4.9.37
Ok, but why are you comparing against 4.9.35? What happened to 4.9.37?
• See details
• build-url: https://ci.linaro.org/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-4.9/ DISTRO=rpb,MACHINE=hikey,label=docker-jessie-amd64/16/ • kernel-repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/ linux-stable.git • kernel-describe: v4.9.37 • kernel-commit: c48f76d680ad9ad443290ce0f1e8f92db6986bf5 • series: lkft • job_status: Canceled
Why send this out if it was cancelled? What cancelled it?
• kernel-config: https://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/morty/hikey/ rpb/linux-stable-4.9/16/defconfig • kernel-branch: linux-4.9.y
Regressions (compared to build v4.9.35)
(none)
That's not true.
Failures
(none)
Neither is that :(
I'm getting really annoyed by these reports, can you either fix them up to be useful, or just stop sending them until they are useful? Right now they are just noise that I have to read to try to see if I broke something.
Heck, kernel.ci is more useful right now, even when they don't respond to my emails asking them why something broke...
thanks,
greg k-h