On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:22:43PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
Soooo that juno boot result is bogus..
On Oct 3, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Linaro QA (beta) qa-reports@linaro.org wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.4.90-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.4.y git commit: 255b4a073a820d2f46a1ce1740f1a9be3de9661a git describe: v4.4.89-42-g255b4a073a82 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.89-42-g...
No regressions (compared to build v4.4.89-30-gb547584d016b)
Boards, architectures and test suites:
juno-r2- arm64
- boot
This test has never passed. So sure compared to the ‘last build’ it isn’t a regression. OTOH it *NEVER* has passed.
It was explicitly requested that the templates for LKFT show regressions *only*. The default SQUAD template shows regressions, failures (including mentioning explicitly which tests never passed), and changes.
Unless we are revisiting that, there is not much that can be done about it.