Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
git repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/hikey-linaro git branch: android-hikey-linaro-4.9 git commit: 7290292f9b7a27687a05a20d393bc8cc227e1c68 git describe: v4.9.65-638684-g7290292f9b7a Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-aosp/build/v4.9....
Regressions (compared to build v4.9.65-638683-g7c9f462e1a43) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
hi6220-hikey - arm64: vts-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelLtp: * KernelLtpTest.syscalls.nanosleep01_32bit
* test src: not informed
Boards, architectures and test suites: -------------------------------------
hi6220-hikey - arm64 * boot - pass: 6, * boottime-test - pass: 3, * vts-staging-test - pass: 2, * vts-staging-test/arm64-v8a.VtsKernelLinuxKselftestStaging - pass: 12, * vts-staging-test/arm64-v8a.VtsKernelLtpStaging - fail: 12, pass: 87, * vts-staging-test/arm64-v8a.VtsKernelRootDir - fail: 3, pass: 1, * vts-staging-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelLinuxKselftestStaging - pass: 11, * vts-staging-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelLtpStaging - fail: 12, pass: 85, * vts-staging-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelRootDir - fail: 3, pass: 1, * vts-test - pass: 6, * vts-test/arm64-v8a.VtsKernelLinuxKselftest - pass: 11, * vts-test/arm64-v8a.VtsKernelLtp - pass: 777, * vts-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelLinuxKselftest - pass: 9, * vts-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelLtp - fail: 1, pass: 785,
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 09:34:08AM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
git repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/hikey-linaro git branch: android-hikey-linaro-4.9 git commit: 7290292f9b7a27687a05a20d393bc8cc227e1c68 git describe: v4.9.65-638684-g7290292f9b7a Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-aosp/build/v4.9....
Regressions (compared to build v4.9.65-638683-g7c9f462e1a43)
hi6220-hikey - arm64: vts-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelLtp: * KernelLtpTest.syscalls.nanosleep01_32bit
Is this to be expected? If not, any hints as to what caused it to break? I know a bunch of new hikey patches went into the tree recently.
thanks,
greg k-h
On 7 December 2017 at 09:39, Greg KH gregkh@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 09:34:08AM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
git repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/hikey-linaro git branch: android-hikey-linaro-4.9 git commit: 7290292f9b7a27687a05a20d393bc8cc227e1c68 git describe: v4.9.65-638684-g7290292f9b7a Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-aosp/build/v4.9....
Regressions (compared to build v4.9.65-638683-g7c9f462e1a43)
hi6220-hikey - arm64: vts-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelLtp: * KernelLtpTest.syscalls.nanosleep01_32bit
Is this to be expected? If not, any hints as to what caused it to break? I know a bunch of new hikey patches went into the tree recently.
I don't know to be honest. I just started to make VTS look sane. I'll check the history.
milosz
On 7 December 2017 at 09:51, Milosz Wasilewski milosz.wasilewski@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 December 2017 at 09:39, Greg KH gregkh@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 09:34:08AM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
git repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/hikey-linaro git branch: android-hikey-linaro-4.9 git commit: 7290292f9b7a27687a05a20d393bc8cc227e1c68 git describe: v4.9.65-638684-g7290292f9b7a Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-aosp/build/v4.9....
Regressions (compared to build v4.9.65-638683-g7c9f462e1a43)
hi6220-hikey - arm64: vts-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelLtp: * KernelLtpTest.syscalls.nanosleep01_32bit
Is this to be expected? If not, any hints as to what caused it to break? I know a bunch of new hikey patches went into the tree recently.
I don't know to be honest. I just started to make VTS look sane. I'll check the history.
+Steve, Vishal
History shows this is the first time the test failed since we started running it: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-aosp/tests/vts-t...
It passed on the previous build which was only 1 commit different - this commit: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/hikey-linaro/+/7290292f9b7a27687a05a...
I restarted the test job to see if the failure is consistent. It should complete in around 1h from now.
milosz
On 7 December 2017 at 10:10, Milosz Wasilewski milosz.wasilewski@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 December 2017 at 09:51, Milosz Wasilewski milosz.wasilewski@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 December 2017 at 09:39, Greg KH gregkh@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 09:34:08AM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
git repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/hikey-linaro git branch: android-hikey-linaro-4.9 git commit: 7290292f9b7a27687a05a20d393bc8cc227e1c68 git describe: v4.9.65-638684-g7290292f9b7a Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-aosp/build/v4.9....
Regressions (compared to build v4.9.65-638683-g7c9f462e1a43)
hi6220-hikey - arm64: vts-test/armeabi-v7a.VtsKernelLtp: * KernelLtpTest.syscalls.nanosleep01_32bit
Is this to be expected? If not, any hints as to what caused it to break? I know a bunch of new hikey patches went into the tree recently.
I don't know to be honest. I just started to make VTS look sane. I'll check the history.
+Steve, Vishal
History shows this is the first time the test failed since we started running it: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-aosp/tests/vts-t...
It passed on the previous build which was only 1 commit different - this commit: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/hikey-linaro/+/7290292f9b7a27687a05a...
I restarted the test job to see if the failure is consistent. It should complete in around 1h from now.
Re-tested and passed this time: https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/results/testcase/9946179 I guess we need to look closer into the test sources.
Same test fails pretty consistently when using OE userspace with the same kernel: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/android-hikey-linaro-4.9-oe/tests/ltp-sys...
milosz