lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe: 1110 tests, 16 failed, 1091 passed (build v4.9.41-94-g80d017f)
Tests: 1110 Failed: 16 Passed: 1091 Skipped: 3 Build: v4.9.41-94-g80d017f Details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.41-94-g...
series: lkft kernel-describe: v4.9.41-94-g80d017f kernel-branch: linux-4.9.y build-url: https://ci.linaro.org/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-4.9/DISTRO=rpb,M... kernel-repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git kernel-config: https://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/morty/hikey/rpb/linux-stable-... kernel-commit: 80d017f094308e9108105724ec2f539f2ce9f6f5 job_status: Complete
Regressions (compared to build v4.9.41-67-g7a50ff8) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
(none)
Failures ------------------------------------------------------------------------
hi6220-hikey:
* kselftest/test_verifier -- never passed * kselftest/test_align -- never passed * kselftest/test_lpm_map -- never passed * kselftest/test_maps -- never passed * kselftest/sync_test -- never passed * kselftest/test_lru_map -- never passed * kselftest/main.sh -- never passed * kselftest/test_kmod.sh -- never passed * kselftest/run.sh -- never passed * ltp-syscalls-tests/runltp_syscalls -- failing since build v4.9.38-73-g91ad9bb, from July 19, 2017, 11:08 a.m. * kselftest/pstore_tests -- never passed * ltp-syscalls-tests/pselect01 -- failing since build v4.9.41, from Aug. 7, 2017, 11 a.m. * kselftest/test_tag -- never passed * kselftest/breakpoint_test_arm64 -- never passed * kselftest/run_vmtests -- failing since build v4.9.37-26-g996828f, from July 13, 2017, 4:27 p.m. * kselftest/run_fuse_test.sh -- never passed
All changes (compared to build v4.9.41-67-g7a50ff8) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
(none)
-- Linaro QA (beta) https://qa-reports.linaro.org
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:29:48PM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Tests: 1110 Failed: 16 Passed: 1091 Skipped: 3 Build: v4.9.41-94-g80d017f Details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.41-94-g...
series: lkft kernel-describe: v4.9.41-94-g80d017f kernel-branch: linux-4.9.y build-url: https://ci.linaro.org/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-4.9/DISTRO=rpb,M... kernel-repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git kernel-config: https://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/morty/hikey/rpb/linux-stable-... kernel-commit: 80d017f094308e9108105724ec2f539f2ce9f6f5 job_status: Complete
Yeah!
Almost-real-time-response, nice work :)
Regressions (compared to build v4.9.41-67-g7a50ff8)
(none)
Failures
hi6220-hikey:
- kselftest/test_verifier -- never passed
- kselftest/test_align -- never passed
- kselftest/test_lpm_map -- never passed
- kselftest/test_maps -- never passed
- kselftest/sync_test -- never passed
- kselftest/test_lru_map -- never passed
- kselftest/main.sh -- never passed
- kselftest/test_kmod.sh -- never passed
- kselftest/run.sh -- never passed
- ltp-syscalls-tests/runltp_syscalls -- failing since build v4.9.38-73-g91ad9bb, from July 19, 2017, 11:08 a.m.
- kselftest/pstore_tests -- never passed
- ltp-syscalls-tests/pselect01 -- failing since build v4.9.41, from Aug. 7, 2017, 11 a.m.
A new failure? Did this run actually catch something "real"?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:44:17PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
- ltp-syscalls-tests/pselect01 -- failing since build v4.9.41, from Aug. 7, 2017, 11 a.m.
A new failure? Did this run actually catch something "real"?
There's pselect01 and pselect01_64. It seems that one of the 5 tests within pselect01 and pselect01_64 fail every time. i.e. v4.9.41 failed pselect01_64 and passed pselect01, but the last two builds failed pselect01 and passed pselect01_64.
v4.9.41: See https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/17875#L7048
pselect01.c:131: FAIL: pselect() slept for too long 3111143us, expected 3000000us, threshold 78000
v4.9.41-94-g80d017f: See https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/17683#L7060
pselect01.c:131: FAIL: pselect() slept for too long 3109769us, expected 3000000us, threshold 78000
Here's the test source (we're running the latest ltp release, but i notice this test has since been refactored in master): https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/20170516/testcases/kernel/sys...
Dan
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:13:35PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:44:17PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
- ltp-syscalls-tests/pselect01 -- failing since build v4.9.41, from Aug. 7, 2017, 11 a.m.
A new failure? Did this run actually catch something "real"?
There's pselect01 and pselect01_64. It seems that one of the 5 tests within pselect01 and pselect01_64 fail every time. i.e. v4.9.41 failed pselect01_64 and passed pselect01, but the last two builds failed pselect01 and passed pselect01_64.
v4.9.41: See https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/17875#L7048
pselect01.c:131: FAIL: pselect() slept for too long 3111143us, expected 3000000us, threshold 78000v4.9.41-94-g80d017f: See https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/17683#L7060
pselect01.c:131: FAIL: pselect() slept for too long 3109769us, expected 3000000us, threshold 78000Here's the test source (we're running the latest ltp release, but i notice this test has since been refactored in master): https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/20170516/testcases/kernel/sys...
Hm, this didn't answer my question, is this a new bug I just created, or is it something that has always been there?
Can I be "trusting" these test results yet? If not, that's fine, I will not, otherwise it would be good to verify I didn't break anything here.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
On 10 August 2017 at 04:58, Greg KH gregkh@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:13:35PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:44:17PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
- ltp-syscalls-tests/pselect01 -- failing since build v4.9.41, from Aug. 7, 2017, 11 a.m.
A new failure? Did this run actually catch something "real"?
There's pselect01 and pselect01_64. It seems that one of the 5 tests within pselect01 and pselect01_64 fail every time. i.e. v4.9.41 failed pselect01_64 and passed pselect01, but the last two builds failed pselect01 and passed pselect01_64.
v4.9.41: See https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/17875#L7048
pselect01.c:131: FAIL: pselect() slept for too long 3111143us, expected 3000000us, threshold 78000v4.9.41-94-g80d017f: See https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/17683#L7060
pselect01.c:131: FAIL: pselect() slept for too long 3109769us, expected 3000000us, threshold 78000Here's the test source (we're running the latest ltp release, but i notice this test has since been refactored in master): https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/20170516/testcases/kernel/sys...
Hm, this didn't answer my question, is this a new bug I just created, or is it something that has always been there?
Apologies in the delay in my response: Short answer: you didn't do it :)
This failure is not new - it has been there for some time now [1]. : It's fix is identified, under internal testing right now before being sent to ltp mailing list for review.
Can I be "trusting" these test results yet? If not, that's fine, I will not, otherwise it would be good to verify I didn't break anything here.
IMHO, I think we can start trusting the results - Tom has already started connecting these failures to existing bugs, so we'd know if there's anything new that is not captured yet. These bugs are also triaged a couple of times each week, to rule out infra issues, if any.
thanks,
greg k-h
Best, Sumit.
[1]: https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3089
Lts-dev mailing list Lts-dev@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lts-dev
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:36:53PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Hi Greg,
On 10 August 2017 at 04:58, Greg KH gregkh@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:13:35PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:44:17PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
- ltp-syscalls-tests/pselect01 -- failing since build v4.9.41, from Aug. 7, 2017, 11 a.m.
A new failure? Did this run actually catch something "real"?
There's pselect01 and pselect01_64. It seems that one of the 5 tests within pselect01 and pselect01_64 fail every time. i.e. v4.9.41 failed pselect01_64 and passed pselect01, but the last two builds failed pselect01 and passed pselect01_64.
v4.9.41: See https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/17875#L7048
pselect01.c:131: FAIL: pselect() slept for too long 3111143us, expected 3000000us, threshold 78000v4.9.41-94-g80d017f: See https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/17683#L7060
pselect01.c:131: FAIL: pselect() slept for too long 3109769us, expected 3000000us, threshold 78000Here's the test source (we're running the latest ltp release, but i notice this test has since been refactored in master): https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/20170516/testcases/kernel/sys...
Hm, this didn't answer my question, is this a new bug I just created, or is it something that has always been there?
Apologies in the delay in my response: Short answer: you didn't do it :)
This failure is not new - it has been there for some time now [1]. : It's fix is identified, under internal testing right now before being sent to ltp mailing list for review.
Ok, thanks for letting me know.
greg k-h
-
Dan Rue -
Greg KH -
Linaro QA -
Sumit Semwal