On 14/04/15 14:45, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 13 April 2015 at 15:39, Juri Lelli juri.lelli@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
On 20/03/15 08:45, pi-cheng.chen wrote:
From: Vincent Guittot vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot vincent.guittot@linaro.org
src/rt-app.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/rt-app.c b/src/rt-app.c index 0c11c72..235c622 100644 --- a/src/rt-app.c +++ b/src/rt-app.c @@ -270,19 +270,6 @@ void *thread_body(void *arg) } }
if (data->wait_before_start > 0) {log_notice("[%d] Waiting %ld usecs... ", data->ind,data->wait_before_start);clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &t_now);t_next = usec_to_timespec(data->wait_before_start);t_next = timespec_add(&t_now, &t_next);clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_MONOTONIC,TIMER_ABSTIME,&t_next,NULL);log_notice("[%d] Starting...", data->ind);}/* if we know the duration we can calculate how many periods we will * do at most, and the log to memory, instead of logging to file. */@@ -299,6 +286,20 @@ void *thread_body(void *arg) "\t\tend\t\tdeadline\tdur.\tslack" "\tBudget\tUsed Budget\n");
if (data->wait_before_start > 0) {log_notice("[%d] Waiting %ld usecs... ", data->ind,data->wait_before_start);clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &t_now);t_next = usec_to_timespec(data->wait_before_start);t_next = timespec_add(&t_now, &t_next);clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_MONOTONIC,TIMER_ABSTIME,&t_next,NULL);log_notice("[%d] Starting...", data->ind);}#ifdef DLSCHED /* TODO find a better way to handle that constraint */ /*
Can you explain in the changelog why we need this fix and what it changes?
ok. The goal is to gather all configuration, init and allocation of the thread and then start the sequence which can start with a wait for a duration
Makes sense. Can we please have something like what you just said in the changelog?
Thanks,
- Juri
Vincent
Thanks,
- Juri