This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 9334711295 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 01f3f99623 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards d5e1ae00a6 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 92c52c9803 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 666a6f387b 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards cad142aaa2 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b3d09eb351 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b2db40d848 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 806cf2cff3 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 6f13270d93 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards ac3c74fd15 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 954be32628 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 5cdd127f5e 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards c12cc27887 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards b9a9e92f38 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5909113788 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards bece042983 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 1d712c0858 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 70d79e6330 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 939d88459d 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1412673142 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f66da5fc8b 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards d27179b58f 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards c765bb4b82 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 7b20fe3253 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 1932b0601d 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards bf19ee9e6a 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 5bd056bdbe 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards f614c55f1b 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 6f79809795 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 1c7fb75e02 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards a57436e573 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 44c561f1e3 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 895fe28534 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7f224c586d 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards c8cf1e16c1 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards f6dab2e6b8 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 0a28d13a7d 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 3366eb7809 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards 12c240e13f 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards f70bf22d07 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards fe5ad63c7c 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a96167b9df 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 48269ee96a 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards c6b5fe95c6 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 14444347bb 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards e2fea60093 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards d1353a9339 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 9c8a3d4c9a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards e784dec04b 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 918c58350e 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards f295ee8c3f 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c7c0300a57 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards eb274eb2c0 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 803487caa2 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 49c71be0a9 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards f608fbf353 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ca2ef34752 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards a37c30aefe 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards ffe13d7ecb 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2aaca12d64 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 57b7e20d4b 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards c297f861a6 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards c7dc39d552 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 8b677148ce 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 19e6641c1a 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 5b6392609a 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 1f3e7d4f6f 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 379125a7b2 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards aab0506449 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 3519972138 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 897699b358 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards d6c1034be2 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 950cd0c1c1 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 639df70fea 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 477a4b39da 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards a8e47c36ad 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards c07c730cc6 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 911b78bfcb 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards e2e37b591d 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards 8e1e0a0921 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5489a135ae 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards ebbb3a730e 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 29a5dfd9f1 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 24f7b07ee2 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 7fe89e845d 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 977d585eb5 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 843dccef8f 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards cffe65385a 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 168aabe634 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 1a3784108f 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards b193becd84 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards fae310726c 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 00412517f7 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 2dabcb5a48 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards cd56947cb8 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards 8abd25cba6 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 0fe10009f7 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9ca719c79d 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 2922d049ea 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] discards e7aedf8b30 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] new 488a84ec31 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] new 1887fb908b 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new e3b8df0df9 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 6a1297be03 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0e558a9192 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 35ff626c6f 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 93cb26c7f2 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4f99d6ec56 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new bf8f6a7401 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 1e459ef024 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 6a400b4f95 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 936af65368 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 9f35c369f4 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 767eb4cfa5 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 44dd67d41e 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 19f9a758e2 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 3f24d16da9 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 81287a66e5 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ae1c7f70a3 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 9fbb960214 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 60cb232f9b 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 8eefd2b9b3 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 8719ebd4d9 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 48f4bb5820 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new e03fa4c262 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 1e32662a21 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new b5b1793520 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6b623db8dd 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new fc1e4aa227 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 1249445aad 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 6cbaa7b496 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 58a5812f60 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 43a8b83c5f 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5a6306a69d 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new b1ee2d7e89 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new f9a58067eb 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 73c2da328c 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 0458868bd2 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 708208e665 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new f229d28a3e 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e2af064e4a 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a846920578 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 92ad415e7e 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new 07ddc7369d 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 7f328734c1 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 92586e476a 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new c4c2215ced 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 5e694ad892 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new fa3501514c 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new eef87c8af6 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2528376c7f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 266b25150d 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new dd95e314b4 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new d17e0a0ae2 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 0fd8270847 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 54e373e5e5 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 2f3add166e 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 7e15cfb399 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 5a5d3305d0 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 370b7176a2 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 77ec6ed914 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4f8e2bcabe 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new e8710b259c 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new d6a95aaadb 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 03cb63c62d 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 08da363a79 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 0728364615 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new d51e7aa312 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ab00ce6648 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b3821a116a 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new a3d4e602b5 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 3759fee7c4 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new c3d1e99b1f 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new 73917f33c1 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new ef211583f6 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f8f04bcbe3 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new b2c139be60 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new c04d784acc 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new b5dd2765e6 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 1c88dffadd 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 17f656adc9 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 159d94a63a 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9d1f30cdf3 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new ed2110c68e 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 1e44e4a76d 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new fbf494cf8c 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 02ae40f8f0 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3af8a2de07 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 7c78e0ef54 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new ba8630190d 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new b470c74887 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 9789b4e9f1 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new d0ea10c231 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 77cca9a68f 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 06c3ad90b2 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 10bec3e401 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 776cd05ea9 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5445ad5ccb 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 61eb0f96f5 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9e8220699a 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 91718d71e6 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 978e9cba88 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (9334711295) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2196 -> 2216 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2480 -> 2472 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27580 -> 27892 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91152 -> 92004 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7700 -> 7772 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234464 -> 234344 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212952 -> 215064 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 174 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 172 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4136 -> 4144 bytes .../437.leslie3d.symbols-improvement | 6 + 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 178 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 19160 -> 20052 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 2 + 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 2 +- 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 2 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 6 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 11 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 10 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 2 +- 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect | 4 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 46 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- mail/exe.improvement | 2 + mail/exe.regression | 2 +- manifest.sh | 20 +- results | 2 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 240 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 1680 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 490266 ++++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 698774 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 16026 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 32 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2924 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3378 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 469897 +++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 699038 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 24714 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 56 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 142 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3361 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3404 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 244 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 28 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2954 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3437 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 629686 ++++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 737534 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28814 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 54 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2920 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3378 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 469897 +++++------ results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 699038 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 24714 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 56 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 142 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3495 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3930 +- results_id | 2 +- 71 files changed, 2520552 insertions(+), 2505506 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement