On 18.03.16 at 08:41, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c @@ -163,6 +163,36 @@ static void __init process_memory_node(const void *fdt, int node, } } +static bool __init check_xsm_signature(const void *fdt, int node,
const char *name,
u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells)
+{
- uint32_t selinux_magic = 0xf97cff8c;
So this would be the 3rd instance of this literal number in the source base. I would have wanted to suggest using one of the two constants we already have, but I don't know which one to pick.
Daniel - why do we have both XSM_MAGIC and FLASK_MAGIC?
Jan