On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:15:28AM +0800, Heyi Guo wrote:
The ehci hardware pin number should be 641, correct it.i
Drop the trailing 'i'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang wangkefeng@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo heyi.guo@linaro.org
Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Mbig.asl | 2 +- Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Usb.asl | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Mbig.asl b/Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Mbig.asl index afd6b47..36a9c0c 100644 --- a/Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Mbig.asl +++ b/Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Mbig.asl @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Scope(_SB) }) Name(_PRS, ResourceTemplate() {
Interrupt(ResourceProducer, Edge, ActiveHigh, Exclusive, 0,,) {0x41, 0x42}
Interrupt(ResourceProducer, Edge, ActiveHigh, Exclusive, 0,,) {640, 641}
This gets confusing though - this is changing 0x41 to 640 (which is not mentioned in commit message) and 0x42 to 641...
})Name(_DSD, Package () { diff --git a/Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Usb.asl b/Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Usb.asl index 8429a4b..5bb03eb 100644 --- a/Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Usb.asl +++ b/Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1610/Hi1610AcpiTables/Dsdt/D03Usb.asl @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Scope(_SB) ) Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveHigh, Exclusive, 0, "\_SB.MBI0") {
0x00000041,
641,
Whereas this is changing a 0x41 to 641.
} }) Return (RBUF) /* \_SB_.USB0._CRS.RBUF */-- 1.9.1