6 Jun
2014
6 Jun
'14
10:40 a.m.
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 17:03 +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
On 06/05/2014 05:10 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Yes, I think so. The spec is intended to be generic and XSM doesn't really fit into that. I think update-grub (which the spec is supposed to be remaining syntax compatible with) won't ever generate an XSM module line anyway so people will already need to edit it manually.
OK, will do so
Could you please mention this in the wiki page or xen doc?
I think the wiki spec is pretty clear about what types should be automatically assigned. In particular "All subsequent modules will be: * compatible = "boot,module" for the third and subsequent node.
Ian.