Hi all,
On 9 March 2016 at 16:22, Fu Wei fu.wei@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Julien,
On 9 March 2016 at 15:10, Julien Grall julien.grall@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
On 08/03/2016 23:37, Fu Wei wrote:
On 8 March 2016 at 14:54, Andrei Borzenkov arvidjaar@gmail.com wrote: So speaking of loading additional modules/lack of initrd on ARM, I thinks that will (only) affect loading XSM. For this, I have discussed of that with Julien, I think : (1) the first module must be kernel (2) the second module must be initrd, if we have initrd (3) Start from the 2nd module, XEN will detect that if the module is a XSM by the XSM binary signature. if we get XSM as the second module, that means we have not initrd.
We need to update Xen for point (3). Fu Wei, could you send a patch for this?
Yes, I think I can do that.
I have posted the patch for this:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg02430.html
please correct me if I misunderstand it
I'm fine with this plan, it matches the x86 behavior.
Great thanks for your review :-)
Cheers,
-- Julien Grall
-- Best regards,
Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct) Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile) Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15, One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District, Shanghai,China 200021