linaro-validation April 2013

linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org

29 participants
31 discussions

Thoughts on progressing Toolchain Working Group Lava integration

by Matthew Gretton-Dann

Paul, I've been having some thoughts about CBuild and Lava and the TCWG integration of them both. I wish to share them and open them up for general discussion. The background to this has been the flakiness of the Panda's (due to heat), the Arndale (due to board 'set-up' issues), and getting a batch of Calxeda nodes working. The following discussion refers to building and testing only, *not* benchmarking. If you look at http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/scheduler you will see a bunch of calxeda01_* nodes have been added to CBuild. After a week of sorting them out they provide builds twice as fast as the Panda boards. However, during the setup of the boards I came to the conclusion that we set build slaves up incorrectly, and that there is a better way. The issues I encountered were: * The Calxeda's run quantal - yet we want to build on precise. * Its hard to get a machine running in hard-float to bootstrap a soft-float compiler and vice-versa. * My understanding of how the Lava integration works is that it runs the cbuild install scripts each time, and so we can't necessarily reproduce a build if the upstream packages have been changed. Having thought about this a bit I came to the conclusion that the simple solution is to use chroots (managed by schroot), and to change the architecture a bit. The old architecture is everything is put into the main file-system as one layer. The new architecture would be to split this into two: 1. Rootfs - Contains just enough to boot the system and knows how to download an appropriate chroot and start it. 2. Chroots - these contain a setup build system that can be used for particular builds. The rootfs can be machine type specific (as necessary), and for builds can be a stock linaro root filesystem. It will contain scripts to set the users needed up, and then to download an appropriate chroot and run it. The chroot will be set up for a particular type of build (soft-float vs hard-float) and will be the same for all platforms. The advantage of this is that I can then download a chroot to my ChromeBook and reproduce a build locally in the same environment to diagnose issues. The Calxeda nodes in cbuild use this type of infrastructure - the rootfs is running quantal (and I have no idea how it is configured - it is what Steve supplied me with). Each node then runs two chroots (precise armel and precise armhf) which take it in turns to ask the cbuild scheduler whether there is a job available. So my first question is does any of the above make sense? Next steps as I see it are: 1. Paul/Dave - what stage is getting the Pandaboards in the Lava farm cooled at? One advantage of the above architecture is we could use a stock Pandaboard kernel & rootfs that has thermal limiting turned on for builds, so that things don't fall over all the time. 2. Paul - how hard would it be to try and fire up a Calxeda node into Lava? We can use one of the ones assigned to me. I don't need any fancy multinode stuff that Michael Hudson-Doyle is working on - each node can be considered a separate board. I feel guilty that I put the nodes into CBuild without looking at Lava - but it was easier to do and got me going - I think correcting that is important 3. Generally - What's the state of the Arndale boards in Lava? Fathi has got GCC building reliably, although I believe he is now facing networking issues. 4. Paul - If Arndale boards are available in Lava - how much effort would it be to make them available to CBuild? One issue the above doesn't solve as far as I see it is being able to say to Lava that we can do a build on any ARMv7-A CBuild compatible board. I don't generally care whether the build happens on an Arndale, Panda, or Calxeda board - I want the result in the shortest possible time. A final note on benchmarking. I think the above scheme could work for benchmarking targets all we need to do is build a kernel/rootfs that is setup to provide a system that produces repeatable benchmarking results. Comments welcome from all. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Gretton-Dann Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

11 years, 8 months

All the boards offline

by Vishal Bhoj

Hi Guys, All the boards are currently shown offline: http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/ Can someone please have a look at it ? Regards, Vishal

11 years, 8 months

Review of jobs submitted @ staging.validation.linaro.org

by Harigopal Gollamudi

Dear validation team, The following tests are migrated from lava android test to lava_test_shell & they have been verified on staging.validation.linaro.org server with job id's mentioned below. The jobs got executed successfully with proper outputs. So, Kindly review them & let me know, If any information is required. Skia # http://staging.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/44595 0xbench # http://staging.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/44597 -- Thanks and Regards, HariGopal G

11 years, 8 months

Error while downloading HWpacks and Binary Pack through LAVA.

by Amber Graner

Hi all, I'm moving this question from Zendesk to the mailing list. Could you please assist Mailme (CC'd on this email) with his download errors. He has provided links for the log messages in his request. Thank you all in advance for you help in this matter. Mailme please add any additional information you may want the team to know. ******* Question Below ****** I am trying to add support for a device in LAVA. I have HW pack and Binary Pack for my board. The problem I am getting is in downloading it through LAVA, while deploying. The log message can be seen at http://paste.ubuntu.com/5715609/ It is "urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden" , but I am able to download the package from the browser as well as using wget command. For this you can see the log at http://paste.ubuntu.com/5715553/ Please help me on this issue as it is a big blockage for my work. ********************************************************* Again thank you all in advance for you help. ~Amber -- Amber Graner Community and Social Media Manager Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/>* **│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs* *** Follow *Linaro: *Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg> | Blog <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> *+1.828.582.9469* cell *+1.828.395.1049* office irc: akgraner amber.graner(a)linaro.org (email and Google chat)

11 years, 9 months

[Android Build Failed] vexpress-linaro-mp Build=257 Failed

by Naresh Kamboju

Hi, I would like to inform you that following builds failed. https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/vexpress-linaro-mp/… https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/vexpress-linaro-mp/… https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/vexpress-linaro-mp/… Build log snapshot: ----------------------- Caused by: hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: channel is already closed Caused by: hudson.remoting.Channel$OrderlyShutdown Caused by: Command close created at FATAL: hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException: hudson.remoting.Channel$OrderlyShutdown build complete log: ----------------------- https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linaro-android_vexpress-linaro… Best regards Naresh Kamboju

11 years, 9 months

v8 fast model license check failures for rtsm_ve-armv8_02

by Amit Pundir

Hi team, All the jobs submitted to rtsm_ve-armv8_02 have failed due to v8 license failures. Can someone please look into it. Regards, Amit Pundir

11 years, 9 months

Upgrade of validation.linaro.org

by Tyler Baker

* Hi, Greetings from LAVA Team! We are very happy to announce you that there are new features getting added to validation.linaro.org. In order to serve you better we are trying to collect metadata from lava-test-shell tests that you are running in validation.linaro.org. On 2013-04-16 we will be deploying a new version of lava-dashboard in validation.linaro.org which requires all lava-test-shell test definitions, which you run should have metadata to be complete. When we say metadata to be complete, following is a sample test definition we refer to: metadata: name: device-tree format: "Lava-Test-Shell Test Definition 1.0" description: "Device tree test to check folder structure." os: - ubuntu devices: - origen - snowball - panda - panda-es - vexpress environment: - lava-test-shell install: bzr-repos: - lp:~linaro-foundations/linaro-ubuntu/lava-test-device-tree run: steps: - "cd lava-test-device-tree; sudo bash -x ./run-test.sh" parse: pattern: "(?P<test_case_id>[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+):\\s(?P<result>\\w+)" However, the sections such as os, devices, environment are optional in the above, but other parameters such as name, format, description are mandatory in the metadata section. If your test definition is not part of a bzr or git repository then it is mandatory to have a 'version' parameter in metadata section. The following example shows how a test definition metadata section will look like for a test definition which is not part of bzr or git repository: metadata: name: device-tree format: "Lava-Test-Shell Test Definition 1.0" version: 1.0 description: "Device tree test to check folder structure." os: - ubuntu devices: - origen - snowball - panda - panda-es - vexpress environment: - lava-test-shell The documentation has been updated to reflect this change: https://lava-dispatcher.readthedocs.org/en/latest/lava_test_shell.html If you have any doubts in the above, please approach linaro-validation <linaro-validation(a)lists.linaro.org>. Remember test definitions that do not adhere to the above notification will fail when run on validation.linaro.org after 2013-04-16. If you want to test the correctness of your test definitions before 2013-04-16 feel free to use staging.validation.linaro.org. Thank You. LAVA Team! *-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, Automation & CI Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

11 years, 9 months

big.LITTLE MP Scheduler test summary-week-15

by Naresh Kamboju

Hi, Release test report big.LITTLE MP week-15: Here is test result summary for big.LITTLE MP Scheduler test on TC2 platform with Android image sched_tests.git No of Test Cases Tests Run Tests Pass Tests Fail Absolute pass rate (%) Failure Analysis/Comments Regression 20 19 19 0 100 % mpbasicsuite 14 10 10 0 100 % mpcoresuite 10 6 5 1 90 % mpextendedsuite 20 10 6 4 60 % mploadbalance 2 2 2 0 100 % Android Build: https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/vexpress-linaro-mp/… Linux kernel: Linux version 3.9.0-rc5-00238-g2b23d54 (jenkins-build@ip-10-226-9 7-251) (gcc version 4.7.3 20130226 (prerelease) (Linaro GCC 4.7-2013.03) ) #1 SMP Wed Apr 10 04:53:19 UTC 2013 Results spread sheet: https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ai9ggMs8bsGJdER3a… Best regards Naresh Kamboju

11 years, 9 months

BP for xml-rpc API addition

by Senthil Kumaran

Hi, I just registered a new BP for creating more XML-RPC APIs - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-dashboard/+spec/xmlrpc-api-additions The 2 items listed in the BP are via requests from naresh and fabo in the past weeks. I request everyone to go through http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/api/help/ and add the missing APIs to the work items of the BP. Thank You. -- Senthil Kumaran http://www.stylesen.org/ http://www.sasenthilkumaran.com/

11 years, 9 months

Extremely hackish but automatic multi-node testing

by Michael Hudson-Doyle

[beware of the x-post!] [resend from correct email address...] Hi all, As discussed briefly with some of you, I've been hacking on some scripts to allow us to run some tests / benchmarks that make use of more than one calxeda node before we get proper support in LAVA. The script is here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+junk/highbank-bench-scripts/view/hea… but it's pretty terrible code, you probably don't want to look at it. More interesting might be the test code branch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+junk/highbank-bench-1/files If it's not clear, the idea here is that: 1) devices.yaml file defines roles for nodes and says how many of each role you want, 2) the test code branch is copied to each node, 3) the run-$rolename.sh script is run on each node, 4) finally the contents of the /lava/results directory on each node is copied back to the system the tests were run from. Coordination between nodes is done via lava-wait-for and lava-send shell scripts as proposed in the connect session. fakedispatcher is invoked with the URL of the test code branch, e.g.: python fakedispatcher.py lp:~mwhudson/+junk/highbank-bench-1 Some notes: 1) I hope that using an "API" like that proposed in the connect session will let us figure out if it's actually a useful api. 2) fakedispatcher is still pretty terrible in many ways (e.g. it has a hardcoded list of (currently just 2) calxeda nodes to use), and either gives obscure errors or just hangs when things go wrong. 3) Despite 2), it does actually work. So I'm pretty happy about that, and would like to talk to all of you about how to write your test cases in a form that works with fakedispatcher :) Cheers, mwh

11 years, 9 months

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

linaro-validation April 2013