14 Sep
2012
14 Sep
'12
2:31 p.m.
On 09/12/2012 08:39 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
Andy wrote [quoting went funny somewhere]:
Here's a way we could do this in lava-test:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~doanac/lava-test/software.sources-support/revision/173
Its minimal overhead (basically none) for the test itself. However, Michael may find it a bit odd how a bolted it on to our framework. Thoughts?
Seems kind of OK. I don't think I have deep conceptual insight into the problem being solved here though :-)
Yesterday during the LAVA team meeting, we came up with a better way to do this in code. It still doesn't cover the "99%" case, but it makes things more transparent to the test-definition. MP to follow soon.