On 12-09-19 04:04 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
On 19 September 2012 07:11, Loïc Minier loic.minier@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012, Dave Pigott wrote:
Device Type Instances vexpress-a5 vexpress-a5-01 vexpress-a9 vexpress-a9-01 vexpress-tc2 vexpress-tc2-01 vexpress-tc2-02 vexpress-tc2-03 vexpress-tc2-04
Notes: * vexpress-tc2-01 will remain offline for external user testing. I'm thinking that perhaps we should switch this around and make that tc2-04 and then remove it from the list to make it tidier
This seems tidier to me as well.
Yes; note that one of the TC2 was actually meant to be reserved to TCWG, with remote access, but we currently have nobody to set it up as they desire (custom kernel with PM features turned off). If the TCWG frees resources to pick this up, they'll grab one of these TC2 boards.
Sorry to vector off a bit, but we could probably get it set up for them. We'd also like a TC2 box we could run code on.
We need to be careful here. The board loan agreement and ARM are very specific about having a box available for general porting. These boxes are for Linaro use only, to support Linaro work. They are not for general member use. ARM sells these to members, and doesn't want sales circumvented in this manner. It was one of the main sticking points in the board loan agreement negotiation AFAIK; ARM was insistent.
I'm not suggesting this is what anyone has planned to do, but please do keep it in mind when evaluating requests to run jobs or work on the board.
- I have one spare a9 tile and a mother board. Does anyone want
me to put this in a new motherboard and bring a second a9 online?
Seems reasonable if we have the hardware and you have the time.
Scott