Re: [Linaro-validation] test / test case management in LAVA

W dniu 25.10.2012 03:13, Michael Hudson-Doyle pisze:

Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hudson@linaro.org writes:

...

...

...

...

...

I wonder if checkbox's rfc822ish format would be better than JSON for test interchange...

Probably although it's still imperfect and suffers from binary deficiency.

Having slept on this (a few times) I think I'm leaning towards .ini files

Actually, now I'm leaning towards YAML. It has its crazy corners but we don't need to advertise those and the core isn't too bad. It's also already used in Linaro to describe hwpacks.

Despite my dislike to YAML and the crazy stuff it supports I'm +1 on the non-flat structure and basic data types.

+1 from me

Thanks ZK

PS: I'll reply to the rest of the thread later today as I had a busy day yesterday