Mimic what's done in nand_soft_waitrdy() and add one to the jiffies
timeout so we don't end up waiting less than actually required.
Reported-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus(a)microchip.com>
Fixes: b0e137ad24b6c ("mtd: rawnand: Provide helper for polling GPIO R/B pin")
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon(a)collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus(a)microchip.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index 2d2a216af120..169150a7c140 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -790,8 +790,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_soft_waitrdy);
int nand_gpio_waitrdy(struct nand_chip *chip, struct gpio_desc *gpiod,
unsigned long timeout_ms)
{
- /* Wait until R/B pin indicates chip is ready or timeout occurs */
- timeout_ms = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms);
+
+ /*
+ * Wait until R/B pin indicates chip is ready or timeout occurs.
+ * +1 below is necessary because if we are now in the last fraction
+ * of jiffy and msecs_to_jiffies is 1 then we will wait only that
+ * small jiffy fraction - possibly leading to false timeout.
+ */
+ timeout_ms = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms) + 1;
do {
if (gpiod_get_value_cansleep(gpiod))
return 0;
--
2.25.4
Not sure nand_cleanup() is the right function to call here but in any
case it is not nand_release(). Indeed, even a comment says that
calling nand_release() is a bit of a hack as there is no MTD device to
unregister. So switch to nand_cleanup() for now and drop this
comment.
There is no Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if it did not intruce
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)bootlin.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
index 97f0b05b47c1..f8ccee797645 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
@@ -1482,13 +1482,10 @@ static int __init doc_probe(unsigned long physadr)
numchips = doc2001_init(mtd);
if ((ret = nand_scan(nand, numchips)) || (ret = doc->late_init(mtd))) {
- /* DBB note: i believe nand_release is necessary here, as
+ /* DBB note: i believe nand_cleanup is necessary here, as
buffers may have been allocated in nand_base. Check with
Thomas. FIX ME! */
- /* nand_release will call mtd_device_unregister, but we
- haven't yet added it. This is handled without incident by
- mtd_device_unregister, as far as I can tell. */
- nand_release(nand);
+ nand_cleanup(nand);
goto fail;
}
--
2.20.1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. Hence, pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug makes sense.
Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)bootlin.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul(a)crapouillou.net>
Cc: Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus(a)gmail.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
index e7bd845fdbf5..3bfb6fa8bad9 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int ingenic_nand_init_chip(struct platform_device *pdev,
ret = mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
if (ret) {
- nand_release(chip);
+ nand_cleanup(chip);
return ret;
}
--
2.20.1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)bootlin.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
index e7ec30e784fd..9dad08bed2bb 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc,
ret = mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "mtd parse partition error\n");
- nand_release(nand);
+ nand_cleanup(nand);
return ret;
}
--
2.20.1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)bootlin.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/orion_nand.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/orion_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/orion_nand.c
index d27b39a7223c..a3dcdf25f5f2 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/orion_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/orion_nand.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int __init orion_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mtd->name = "orion_nand";
ret = mtd_device_register(mtd, board->parts, board->nr_parts);
if (ret) {
- nand_release(nc);
+ nand_cleanup(nc);
goto no_dev;
}
--
2.20.1
nand_cleanup() is supposed to be called on error after a successful
call to nand_scan() to free all NAND resources.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)bootlin.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c
index 9cfe7395172a..be40b2f32237 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/pasemi_nand.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int pasemi_nand_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
if (mtd_device_register(pasemi_nand_mtd, NULL, 0)) {
dev_err(dev, "Unable to register MTD device\n");
err = -ENODEV;
- goto out_lpc;
+ goto out_cleanup_nand;
}
dev_info(dev, "PA Semi NAND flash at %pR, control at I/O %x\n", &res,
@@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ static int pasemi_nand_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
return 0;
+out_cleanup:
+ nand_cleanup(chip);
out_lpc:
release_region(lpcctl, 4);
out_ior:
--
2.20.1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)bootlin.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/plat_nand.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/plat_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/plat_nand.c
index dc0f3074ddbf..3a495b233443 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/plat_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/plat_nand.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int plat_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!err)
return err;
- nand_release(&data->chip);
+ nand_cleanup(&data->chip);
out:
if (pdata->ctrl.remove)
pdata->ctrl.remove(pdev);
--
2.20.1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense.
Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)bootlin.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sharpsl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sharpsl.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sharpsl.c
index b47a9eaff89b..d8c52a016080 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sharpsl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sharpsl.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int sharpsl_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
err_add:
- nand_release(this);
+ nand_cleanup(this);
err_scan:
iounmap(sharpsl->io);
--
2.20.1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)bootlin.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/socrates_nand.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/socrates_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/socrates_nand.c
index 20f40c0e812c..7c94fc51a611 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/socrates_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/socrates_nand.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static int socrates_nand_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
if (!res)
return res;
- nand_release(nand_chip);
+ nand_cleanup(nand_chip);
out:
iounmap(host->io_base);
--
2.20.1