From: Sascha Hauer s.hauer@pengutronix.de
commit 06781a5026350cde699d2d10c9914a25c1524f45 upstream.
The DEVICE_BUSY_TIMEOUT value is described in the Reference Manual as:
| Timeout waiting for NAND Ready/Busy or ATA IRQ. Used in WAIT_FOR_READY | mode. This value is the number of GPMI_CLK cycles multiplied by 4096.
So instead of multiplying the value in cycles with 4096, we have to divide it by that value. Use DIV_ROUND_UP to make sure we are on the safe side, especially when the calculated value in cycles is smaller than 4096 as typically the case.
This bug likely never triggered because any timeout != 0 usually will do. In my case the busy timeout in cycles was originally calculated as 2408, which multiplied with 4096 is 0x968000. The lower 16 bits were taken for the 16 bit wide register field, so the register value was 0x8000. With 2970bf5a32f0 ("mtd: rawnand: gpmi: fix controller timings setting") however the value in cycles became 2384, which multiplied with 4096 is 0x950000. The lower 16 bit are 0x0 now resulting in an intermediate timeout when reading from NAND.
Fixes: b1206122069aa ("mtd: rawnand: gpmi: use core timings instead of an empirical derivation") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.hauer@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20220614083138.3455683-1-s.hauer@pengutron... Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static int gpmi_nfc_compute_timings(stru hw->timing0 = BF_GPMI_TIMING0_ADDRESS_SETUP(addr_setup_cycles) | BF_GPMI_TIMING0_DATA_HOLD(data_hold_cycles) | BF_GPMI_TIMING0_DATA_SETUP(data_setup_cycles); - hw->timing1 = BF_GPMI_TIMING1_BUSY_TIMEOUT(busy_timeout_cycles * 4096); + hw->timing1 = BF_GPMI_TIMING1_BUSY_TIMEOUT(DIV_ROUND_UP(busy_timeout_cycles, 4096));
/* * Derive NFC ideal delay from {3}: