On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:35:46PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
- linux-nfs and more
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 19:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.48 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:14:28 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.48-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Following test regression found on stable-rc 6.1. Rpi4 is using NFS mount rootfs and running LTP syscalls testing. chown02 tests creating testfile2 on NFS mounted and validating the functionality and found that it was a failure.
This is already been reported by others on lore and fix patch merged into stable-rc linux-6.4.y [1] and [2].
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Odd, it's not a regression in this -rc cycle, so it was missed in the previous ones somehow?
I have re-tested with newers and older versions of the kernel and here I confirm that this is not a regression from this round of stable rc review.
We have made a couple of changes to our infrastructure and are investigating the root cause of these two test cases failures.
- Naresh