On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 11:38:56AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 12:08:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:24:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:07:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.192 release. There are 135 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 17:05:50 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Testing is not complete, but early feedback: All riscv32 boot tests crash badly with errors such as
Starting syslogd: OK Starting klogd: OK /etc/init.d/S02sysctl: line 68: syntax error: EOF in backquote substitution /etc/init.d/S20seedrng: line 33: syntax error: unexpected end of file (expecting ";;") Starting network: /bin/sh: syntax error: unterminated quoted string sed: unmatched '/' /bin/sh: syntax error: unterminated quoted string FAIL /etc/init.d/S55runtest: line 48: syntax error: EOF in backquote substitution
This is no longer seen after reverting the following patches.
92609bb3a1f8 riscv: uaccess: Return the number of bytes effectively not copied e06648704417 riscv: lib: uaccess: fix CSR_STATUS SR_SUM bit 20704d763646 riscv: lib: uaccess: fold fixups into body 4f503bad920e riscv: __asm_copy_to-from_user: Optimize unaligned memory access and pipeline stall
Thanks for the review, I'll go drop all of the riscv patches here. Really, we shouldn't be adding any of them to any kernels older than 5.15 these days as I do not think anyone using that cpu is using those older kernels (or at least I sure hope not...)
I know one of the main cpu IP vendors does run a 5.10 based tree, but that thing is both an abomination of out-of-tree patches to core arch code & about 100 releases out of date, therefore not really worth factoring. Anyone in their right mind should be running something significantly more recent than 5.10 for riscv.
Thanks for the verification. Anyone using such an abomination of a tree, gets their support from the creator of such an abomination :)
greg k-h