Hi all,
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:01:34 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bigeasy@linutronix.de wrote:
Andrew, please merge it into: locking/rwlocks: introduce write_lock_nested locking-rwlocks-introduce-write_lock_nested.patch
And if someone could test it, I get sh4 defconfig built with and without lockdep. x86 seems still to build, too. So it can't be that bad.
v1…v2: I noticed a typo in _raw_write_lock_nested() and decided that it is no needed so now it is removed for !CONFIG_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bigeasy@linutronix.de
include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h | 1 - kernel/locking/spinlock.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h index f0c535ec4e654..dceb0a59b6927 100644 --- a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h +++ b/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ _raw_write_unlock_irqrestore(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags) #ifdef CONFIG_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK #define _raw_write_lock(lock) __raw_write_lock(lock) -#define _raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass) __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass) #endif #ifdef CONFIG_INLINE_READ_LOCK_BH diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c index 996811efa6d6e..7f49baaa49793 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c @@ -301,6 +301,10 @@ void __lockfunc _raw_write_lock(rwlock_t *lock) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(_raw_write_lock); +#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC +#define __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass) __raw_write_lock(((void)(subclass), (lock))) +#endif
void __lockfunc _raw_write_lock_nested(rwlock_t *lock, int subclass) { __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass); -- 2.34.0
I have added that patch to iinux-next today.