Hi Martijn
Sorry for noise. I see your patch in here[1] . I will modify ioctl_loop01 to test that LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN can not clear and LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR can be clear.
ps: Giving the url of patch is better so that other people doesn't need to investigate it again. [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11588321/
Best Regards Yang Xu
Hi Martijn
Hi Naresh,
I just sent a patch and cc'd you. I verified all the loop tests pass again with that patch.
I think you want to say "without". I verified the ioctl_loop01 fails with faf1d25440 ("loop: Clean up LOOP_SET_STATUS lo_flags handling").
This kernel commit breaks old behaviour(if old flag all 0, new flag is always 0 regradless your flag setting).
I think we should modify code as below: diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c index 13518ba191f5..c6ba8cf486ce 100644 --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -1364,11 +1364,9 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info) if (err) goto out_unfreeze;
- /* Mask out flags that can't be set using LOOP_SET_STATUS. */ - lo->lo_flags &= ~LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS; - /* For those flags, use the previous values instead */ - lo->lo_flags |= prev_lo_flags & ~LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS; - /* For flags that can't be cleared, use previous values too */ + /* Mask out flags that can be set using LOOP_SET_STATUS. */ + lo->lo_flags &= LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS; + /* For flags that can't be cleared, use previous values. */ lo->lo_flags |= prev_lo_flags &~LOOP_SET_STATUS_CLEARABLE_FLAGS;
Best Regards Yang Xu
Thanks, Martijn
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:10 PM Martijn Coenen maco@android.com wrote:
Hi Naresh,
I suspect the loop failures are due to faf1d25440d6ad06d509dada4b6fe62fea844370 ("loop: Clean up LOOP_SET_STATUS lo_flags handling"), I will investigate and get back to you.
Thanks, Martijn
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 7:19 PM Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote:
- linux-block@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 22:47, Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote:
Following three test cases reported as regression on Linux mainline kernel on x86_64, arm64, arm and i386
ltp-syscalls-tests: * ioctl_loop01 * mknod07 * setns01
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git git branch: master GOOD: git commit: b23c4771ff62de8ca9b5e4a2d64491b2fb6f8f69 git describe: v5.7-1230-gb23c4771ff62 BAD: git commit: 1ee08de1e234d95b5b4f866878b72fceb5372904 git describe: v5.7-3523-g1ee08de1e234
kernel-config: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/U3bU0dMA62OVHb4DvZIVuw/kernel.config
We are investigating these failures.
tst_test.c:906: CONF: btrfs driver not available tst_test.c:1246: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 15m 00s tst_device.c:88: INFO: Found free device 1 '/dev/loop1' ioctl_loop01.c:49: PASS: /sys/block/loop1/loop/partscan = 0 [ 1073.639677] loop_set_status: loop1 () has still dirty pages (nrpages=1) ioctl_loop01.c:50: PASS: /sys/block/loop1/loop/autoclear = 0 ioctl_loop01.c:51: PASS: /sys/block/loop1/loop/backing_file = '/scratch/ltp-mnIdulzriQ/9cPtLQ/test.img' ioctl_loop01.c:63: FAIL: expect 12 but got 17 ioctl_loop01.c:67: FAIL: /sys/block/loop1/loop/partscan != 1 got 0 ioctl_loop01.c:68: FAIL: /sys/block/loop1/loop/autoclear != 1 got 0 ioctl_loop01.c:79: FAIL: access /dev/loop1p1 fails [ 1073.679678] loop_set_status: loop1 () has still dirty pages (nrpages=1) ioctl_loop01.c:85: FAIL: access /sys/block/loop1/loop1p1 fails
HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes, see: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...
mke2fs 1.43.8 (1-Jan-2018) [ 1264.711379] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 subsystem [ 1264.716642] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: (null) mknod07 0 TINFO : Using test device LTP_DEV='/dev/loop0' mknod07 0 TINFO : Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext2 opts='' extra opts='' mknod07 1 TPASS : mknod failed as expected: TEST_ERRNO=EACCES(13): Permission denied mknod07 2 TPASS : mknod failed as expected: TEST_ERRNO=EACCES(13): Permission denied mknod07 3 TFAIL : mknod07.c:155: mknod succeeded unexpectedly mknod07 4 TPASS : mknod failed as expected: TEST_ERRNO=EPERM(1): Operation not permitted mknod07 5 TPASS : mknod failed as expected: TEST_ERRNO=EROFS(30): Read-only file system mknod07 6 TPASS : mknod failed as expected: TEST_ERRNO=ELOOP(40): Too many levels of symbolic links
setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=ipc, ns_fds[0]=6, ns_types[0]=0x8000000 setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=mnt, ns_fds[1]=7, ns_types[1]=0x20000 setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=net, ns_fds[2]=8, ns_types[2]=0x40000000 setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=pid, ns_fds[3]=9, ns_types[3]=0x20000000 setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=uts, ns_fds[4]=10, ns_types[4]=0x4000000 setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x8000000) setns01 1 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9 setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x20000) setns01 2 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9 setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x40000000) setns01 3 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9 setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x20000000) setns01 4 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9 setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x4000000) setns01 5 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9 setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x8000000) setns01 6 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22: errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x20000) setns01 7 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22: errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x40000000) setns01 8 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22: errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x20000000) setns01 9 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22: errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x4000000) setns01 10 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22: errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor
Full test log link, https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/1467931#L8047
test results comparison shows this test case started failing from June-2-2020 https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v5.7-4092-g38696e...
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v5.7-4092-g38696e...
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v5.7-4092-g38696e...
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org