Hi Arnd,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 2:50 PM Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:38 PM Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote:
While building Linux next 20211123 tag for sh with gcc-11 following warnings / errors noticed.
Nothing in here looks like a recent regression from either the kernel or gcc-11.
Except for:
kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean '_raw_write_lock_nested'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 306 | __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | _raw_write_lock_nested
Which was also reported for other architectures: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202111201111.c2ApGeHR-lkp@intel.com/
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds