This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.204 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.204-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 4.19.204-rc1
YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com net: xilinx_emaclite: Do not print real IOMEM pointer
Miklos Szeredi mszeredi@redhat.com ovl: prevent private clone if bind mount is not allowed
Pali Rohár pali@kernel.org ppp: Fix generating ppp unit id when ifname is not specified
Longfang Liu liulongfang@huawei.com USB:ehci:fix Kunpeng920 ehci hardware problem
Lai Jiangshan laijs@linux.alibaba.com KVM: X86: MMU: Use the correct inherited permissions to get shadow page
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net bpf, selftests: Adjust few selftest outcomes wrt unreachable code
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net bpf: Fix leakage under speculation on mispredicted branches
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net bpf: Do not mark insn as seen under speculative path verification
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net bpf: Inherit expanded/patched seen count from old aux data
Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org tracing: Reject string operand in the histogram expression
Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com KVM: SVM: Fix off-by-one indexing when nullifying last used SEV VMCB
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/virtual/kvm/mmu.txt | 4 +- Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 14 ++++-- arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_emaclite.c | 5 +- drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 19 ++++++-- drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c | 3 ++ fs/namespace.c | 42 +++++++++++------ kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 14 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 + 11 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
On 8/13/21 9:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.204 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.204-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 05:07:07PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.204 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210723): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210723): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210723): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/27
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 at 20:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.204 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.204-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 4.19.204-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-4.19.y * git commit: b834d1a90a9e65e1801193248f277d85161dfe69 * git describe: v4.19.202-66-gb834d1a90a9e * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19....
## No regressions (compared to v4.19.202-55-g752ef2004f4b)
## No fixes (compared to v4.19.202-55-g752ef2004f4b)
## Test result summary total: 77080, pass: 62531, fail: 392, skip: 12637, xfail: 1520
## Build Summary * arm: 98 total, 98 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * i386: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * mips: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * prep-tmp-disk * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 05:07:07PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.204 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 439 pass: 439 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
guenter
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.204 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any kernel problems here: (but we have some infrastructure problems)
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 2021/8/13 23:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.204 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.204-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 4.19.204-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-4.19.y Version: 4.19.204-rc1 Commit: b834d1a90a9e65e1801193248f277d85161dfe69 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8859 passed: 8859 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8859 passed: 8859 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com