This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.74-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.74-rc1
Brandon Wyman bjwyman@gmail.com hwmon: (pmbus/ibm-cffps) max_power_out swap changes
Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org sched: Always inline is_percpu_thread()
Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com perf/core: fix userpage->time_enabled of inactive events
Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com scsi: virtio_scsi: Fix spelling mistake "Unsupport" -> "Unsupported"
Jiapeng Chong jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com scsi: ses: Fix unsigned comparison with less than zero
Leslie Shi Yuliang.Shi@amd.com drm/amdgpu: fix gart.bo pin_count leak
Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org net: sun: SUNVNET_COMMON should depend on INET
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org vboxfs: fix broken legacy mount signature checking
MichelleJin shjy180909@gmail.com mac80211: check return value of rhashtable_init
王贇 yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com net: prevent user from passing illegal stab size
Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de hwmon: (ltc2947) Properly handle errors when looking for the external clock
Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk m68k: Handle arrivals of multiple signals correctly
YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com mac80211: Drop frames from invalid MAC address in ad-hoc mode
Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de netfilter: nf_nat_masquerade: defer conntrack walk to work queue
Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de netfilter: nf_nat_masquerade: make async masq_inet6_event handling generic
Marc Herbert marc.herbert@intel.com ASoC: SOF: loader: release_firmware() on load failure to avoid batching
Joshua-Dickens Joshua@Joshua-Dickens.com HID: wacom: Add new Intuos BT (CTL-4100WL/CTL-6100WL) device IDs
Jeremy Sowden jeremy@azazel.net netfilter: ip6_tables: zero-initialize fragment offset
Mizuho Mori morimolymoly@gmail.com HID: apple: Fix logical maximum and usage maximum of Magic Keyboard JIS
Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw: tag SoundWire BEs as non-atomic
Zhang Yi yi.zhang@huawei.com ext4: correct the error path of ext4_write_inline_data_end()
Zhang Yi yi.zhang@huawei.com ext4: check and update i_disksize properly
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/m68k/kernel/signal.c | 88 +++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 3 +- drivers/hid/hid-apple.c | 7 ++ drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c | 8 ++ drivers/hwmon/ltc2947-core.c | 8 +- drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ibm-cffps.c | 10 +- drivers/net/ethernet/sun/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/scsi/ses.c | 2 +- drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/inline.c | 15 +-- fs/ext4/inode.c | 41 ++++---- fs/vboxsf/super.c | 12 +-- include/linux/perf_event.h | 4 +- include/linux/sched.h | 2 +- include/net/pkt_sched.h | 1 + kernel/events/core.c | 34 ++++++- net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c | 1 + net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c | 5 +- net/mac80211/rx.c | 3 +- net/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade.c | 168 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- net/sched/sch_api.c | 6 ++ sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c | 5 + sound/soc/sof/core.c | 4 +- sound/soc/sof/loader.c | 2 + 26 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 177 deletions(-)
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:54:06 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.74-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.74-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:54:06 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.74-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.74-rc1-gbcc91adcbbcd Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 10/14/21 7:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.74-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 10/14/21 8:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.74-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 2021/10/14 22:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.74-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.74-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.74-rc1 Commit: aec8cedeb05fb1fc0b8888b71a8191b879df6007 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8907 passed: 8907 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8907 passed: 8907 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 04:54:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/268 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/269
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
Hello!
On 10/14/21 9:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.74-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.74-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: bcc91adcbbcd65b4413d295cb433daa73ffa3700 * git describe: v5.10.73-23-gbcc91adcbbcd * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.73)
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.73)
## Test result summary total: 91036, pass: 77180, fail: 547, skip: 12462, xfail: 847
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 289 total, 289 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
Greetings!
Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 04:54:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.74 release. There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 472 pass: 472 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter