This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.31-rc1
Juergen Gross jgross@suse.com xen/events: fix setting irq affinity
Russell King rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk net: sfp: cope with SFPs that set both LOS normal and LOS inverted
Russell King rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk net: sfp: relax bitrate-derived mode check
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme@redhat.com perf map: Tighten snprintf() string precision to pass gcc check on some 32-bit arches
Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de netfilter: x_tables: fix compat match/target pad out-of-bound write
Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com block: don't ignore REQ_NOWAIT for direct IO
Zihao Yu yuzihao@ict.ac.cn riscv,entry: fix misaligned base for excp_vect_table
Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk io_uring: don't mark S_ISBLK async work as unbounded
Damien Le Moal damien.lemoal@wdc.com null_blk: fix command timeout completion handling
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) willy@infradead.org idr test suite: Create anchor before launching throbber
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) willy@infradead.org idr test suite: Take RCU read lock in idr_find_test_1
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) willy@infradead.org radix tree test suite: Register the main thread with the RCU library
Yufen Yu yuyufen@huawei.com block: only update parent bi_status when bio fail
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) willy@infradead.org radix tree test suite: Fix compilation
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) willy@infradead.org XArray: Fix splitting to non-zero orders
Mikko Perttunen mperttunen@nvidia.com gpu: host1x: Use different lock classes for each client
Dmitry Osipenko digetx@gmail.com drm/tegra: dc: Don't set PLL clock to 0Hz
Stefan Raspl raspl@linux.ibm.com tools/kvm_stat: Add restart delay
Steven Rostedt (VMware) rostedt@goodmis.org ftrace: Check if pages were allocated before calling free_pages()
Bob Peterson rpeterso@redhat.com gfs2: report "already frozen/thawed" errors
Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de drm/imx: imx-ldb: fix out of bounds array access warning
Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com KVM: arm64: Disable guest access to trace filter controls
Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com KVM: arm64: Hide system instruction access to Trace registers
Andrew Price anprice@redhat.com gfs2: Flag a withdraw if init_threads() fails
Jia-Ju Bai baijiaju1990@gmail.com interconnect: core: fix error return code of icc_link_destroy()
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 - arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c | 2 ++ arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 1 + block/bio.c | 2 +- drivers/block/null_blk.h | 1 + drivers/block/null_blk_main.c | 26 ++++++++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c | 10 +++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c | 10 +++---- drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c | 10 ++++--- drivers/interconnect/core.c | 2 ++ drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c | 11 ++++---- drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 36 +++++++++++++++---------- drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 4 +-- fs/block_dev.c | 4 +++ fs/gfs2/super.c | 14 ++++++---- fs/io_uring.c | 2 +- include/linux/host1x.h | 9 ++++++- kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 9 ++++--- lib/test_xarray.c | 26 +++++++++--------- lib/xarray.c | 4 +-- net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c | 2 ++ net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c | 2 ++ net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c | 2 ++ net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 10 ++----- tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat.service | 1 + tools/perf/util/map.c | 7 +++-- tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c | 10 +++++-- tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/compiler_types.h | 0 tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray.c | 2 ++ 32 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any kernel problems here: (some boards are unavailable)
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4... https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4... https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
I found no issues with my i686 (gcc 10.3) Selftests result [ok/not ok]: 1434/82 No regressions compared to 5.10.30-rc1
Tested-by: Andrei Rabusov a.rabusov@tum.de
On 4/15/21 8:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 4/15/2021 7:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:47:54 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 70 tests: 70 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.31-rc1-g32f5704a0a4f Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.31-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 32f5704a0a4f7dcc8aa74a49dbcce359d758f6d5 * git describe: v5.10.30-26-g32f5704a0a4f * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.30)
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.30)
## Test result summary total: 72955, pass: 61311, fail: 1785, skip: 9589, xfail: 270,
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mod[ * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 10.3.1 20210416): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 10.3.1 20210416): 105 configs -> no new failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. arm: Booted on rpi3b. No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On 2021/4/15 22:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.31-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.31-rc1 Commit: 32f5704a0a4f7dcc8aa74a49dbcce359d758f6d5 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 5764 passed: 5764 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 5764 passed: 5764 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com