This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.297 release. There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:13:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.297-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 4.4.297-rc1
Rémi Denis-Courmont remi@remlab.net phonet/pep: refuse to enable an unbound pipe
Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn hamradio: improve the incomplete fix to avoid NPD
Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn hamradio: defer ax25 kfree after unregister_netdev
Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn ax25: NPD bug when detaching AX25 device
Samuel Čavoj samuel@cavoj.net Input: i8042 - enable deferred probe quirk for ASUS UM325UA
Juergen Gross jgross@suse.com xen/blkfront: fix bug in backported patch
Ard Biesheuvel ardb@kernel.org ARM: 9169/1: entry: fix Thumb2 bug in iWMMXt exception handling
Colin Ian King colin.i.king@gmail.com ALSA: drivers: opl3: Fix incorrect use of vp->state
Xiaoke Wang xkernel.wang@foxmail.com ALSA: jack: Check the return value of kstrdup()
Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net hwmon: (lm90) Fix usage of CONFIG2 register in detect function
Jiasheng Jiang jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn drivers: net: smc911x: Check for error irq
Fernando Fernandez Mancera ffmancera@riseup.net bonding: fix ad_actor_system option setting to default
Jiasheng Jiang jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn qlcnic: potential dereference null pointer of rx_queue->page_ring
José Expósito jose.exposito89@gmail.com IB/qib: Fix memory leak in qib_user_sdma_queue_pkts()
Benjamin Tissoires benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com HID: holtek: fix mouse probing
Jimmy Assarsson extja@kvaser.com can: kvaser_usb: get CAN clock frequency from device
Greg Jesionowski jesionowskigreg@gmail.com net: usb: lan78xx: add Allied Telesis AT29M2-AF
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/networking/bonding.txt | 11 +++--- Makefile | 4 +-- arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 8 ++--- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 4 --- drivers/hid/hid-holtek-mouse.c | 15 ++++++++ drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 5 ++- drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_sdma.c | 2 +- drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h | 7 ++++ drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 2 +- drivers/net/can/usb/kvaser_usb.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_sriov.h | 2 +- .../ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_sriov_common.c | 12 +++++-- .../net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_sriov_pf.c | 4 ++- drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c | 5 +++ drivers/net/hamradio/mkiss.c | 5 +-- drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c | 6 ++++ net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 4 ++- net/phonet/pep.c | 2 ++ sound/core/jack.c | 4 +++ sound/drivers/opl3/opl3_midi.c | 2 +- 20 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.297 release. There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 04:26:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.297 release. There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:13:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 160 pass: 160 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 339 pass: 339 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 20:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.297 release. There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:13:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.297-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 4.4.297-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-4.4.y * git commit: ea28db322a98fc90032bea9e517d2beec25bf5b6 * git describe: v4.4.296-18-gea28db322a98 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.29...
## No Test Regressions (compared to v4.4.296)
## No Test Fixes (compared to v4.4.296)
## Test result summary total: 46781, pass: 37737, fail: 196, skip: 7823, xfail: 1025
## Build Summary * arm: 129 total, 129 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed * i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 30 total, 24 passed, 6 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On 12/27/21 8:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.297 release. There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:13:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.297-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.297 release. There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
4.4.X series is scheduled for EOL next month. Do you have any estimates if it will be more like Feb 2 or Feb 27?
CIP project is commited to maintaining 4.4.X after the EOL, and we need to figure out what to do next. Is there anyone else interested in maintaining 4.4.X after the February?
Best regards,
Pavel
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:28:58AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.297 release. There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
4.4.X series is scheduled for EOL next month. Do you have any estimates if it will be more like Feb 2 or Feb 27?
I would bet on Feb 1 :)
good luck!
greg k-h
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.297 release. There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
4.4.X series is scheduled for EOL next month. Do you have any estimates if it will be more like Feb 2 or Feb 27?
I would bet on Feb 1 :)
Hmm. That does not leave us too much time.
FAQ states:
# Why are some longterm versions supported longer than others? The # "projected EOL" dates are not set in stone. Each new longterm kernel # usually starts with only a 2-year projected EOL that can be extended # further if there is enough interest from the industry at large to # help support it for a longer period of time.
Is there anyone else interested in continued 4.4.X maintainence?
CIP project will need to maintain 4.4.X-cip and 4.4.X-cip-rt for some more years. Do you think it would make sense to maintain 4.4.X-stable as well? What would be requirements for doing so?
Best regards, Pavel
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 02:49:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.297 release. There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
4.4.X series is scheduled for EOL next month. Do you have any estimates if it will be more like Feb 2 or Feb 27?
I would bet on Feb 1 :)
Hmm. That does not leave us too much time.
FAQ states:
# Why are some longterm versions supported longer than others? The # "projected EOL" dates are not set in stone. Each new longterm kernel # usually starts with only a 2-year projected EOL that can be extended # further if there is enough interest from the industry at large to # help support it for a longer period of time.
Is there anyone else interested in continued 4.4.X maintainence?
I do not know of any companies or interested parties that is interested in this. The ones that rely on 4.4.x right now are going to be dropping support for it this month, if they haven't already from what I know.
So I have no resources to maintain this anymore, sorry, and I STRONGLY recommend that everyone else just move off of it as well.
CIP project will need to maintain 4.4.X-cip and 4.4.X-cip-rt for some more years.
That is up to them to do, I wish them well, I think it is a loosing game and one that is going to cost more money than they realize. Remember, it costs more money and time the older the kernel is to keep it "alive". It is cheaper and easier to use more modern kernels.
Do you think it would make sense to maintain 4.4.X-stable as well?
Not at all. It is barely alive as-is. If you _HAVE_ to maintain it, I recommend only doing it on a very narrow way (i.e. limited functionality and hardware support). That's the only possible way you will be able to do this.
good luck!
greg k-h
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Shuah Khan