This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.4.277-rc1
Akira Yokosawa akiyks@gmail.com docs: kernel_include.py: Cope with docutils 0.21
Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org serial: kgdboc: Fix NMI-safety problems from keyboard reset code
Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com usb: typec: ucsi: displayport: Fix potential deadlock
Srinivasan Shanmugam srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com drm/amdgpu: Fix possible NULL dereference in amdgpu_ras_query_error_status_helper()
Dominique Martinet dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com btrfs: add missing mutex_unlock in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()
Rob Herring robh@kernel.org arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells
Cristian Marussi cristian.marussi@arm.com firmware: arm_scmi: Harden accesses to the reset domains
Paulo Alcantara pc@manguebit.com smb: client: fix potential OOBs in smb2_parse_contexts()
Doug Berger opendmb@gmail.com net: bcmgenet: synchronize UMAC_CMD access
Doug Berger opendmb@gmail.com net: bcmgenet: synchronize use of bcmgenet_set_rx_mode()
Doug Berger opendmb@gmail.com net: bcmgenet: synchronize EXT_RGMII_OOB_CTRL access
Doug Berger opendmb@gmail.com net: bcmgenet: keep MAC in reset until PHY is up
Doug Berger opendmb@gmail.com Revert "net: bcmgenet: use RGMII loopback for MAC reset"
Harshit Mogalapalli harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com Revert "selftests: mm: fix map_hugetlb failure on 64K page size systems"
Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search
Sergey Shtylyov s.shtylyov@omp.ru pinctrl: core: handle radix_tree_insert() errors in pinctrl_register_one_pin()
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py | 1 - Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 8 +-- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/reset.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 3 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c | 22 ++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.h | 2 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet_wol.c | 12 +++- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmmii.c | 43 +++--------- drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 14 +++- drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c | 30 +++++++- drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/displayport.c | 4 -- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 + fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 4 +- fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c | 79 ++++++++++++++-------- fs/cifs/smb2proto.h | 10 +-- fs/ext4/extents.c | 10 +-- tools/testing/selftests/vm/map_hugetlb.c | 7 -- 18 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli florian.fainelli@broadcom.com
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org
Hi Greg,
On 23/05/24 18:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com
Thanks, Harshit
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 15:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 135 total, 135 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 35 total, 33 passed, 2 failed * i386: 23 total, 17 passed, 6 failed * mips: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed * powerpc: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * s390: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-exec * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-x86 * kunit * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-smoketest * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * perf * rcutorture
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:33 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 24 boots: 24 pass, 0 fail 54 tests: 54 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.277-rc1-g4848ef9e7e21 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 5/23/24 07:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah