This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.93-rc1
Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de mtd: fixup CFI on ixp4xx
Nicholas Piggin npiggin@gmail.com powerpc/pseries: Get entry and uaccess flush required bits from H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS
Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de ALSA: hda/realtek: Re-order quirk entries for Lenovo
Baole Fang fbl718@163.com ALSA: hda/realtek: Add quirk for Legion Y9000X 2020
Bart Kroon bart@tarmack.eu ALSA: hda: ALC287: Add Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 speaker quirk
Christian Lachner gladiac@gmail.com ALSA: hda/realtek - Fix silent output on Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master after reboot from Windows
Arie Geiger arsgeiger@gmail.com ALSA: hda/realtek: Add speaker fixup for some Yoga 15ITL5 devices
Wei Wang wei.w.wang@intel.com KVM: x86: remove PMU FIXED_CTR3 from msrs_to_save_all
Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org firmware: qemu_fw_cfg: fix kobject leak in probe error path
Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org firmware: qemu_fw_cfg: fix NULL-pointer deref on duplicate entries
Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org firmware: qemu_fw_cfg: fix sysfs information leak
Larry Finger Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: Fix WARNING when calling local_irq_restore() with interrupts enabled
Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org media: uvcvideo: fix division by zero at stream start
Javier Martinez Canillas javierm@redhat.com video: vga16fb: Only probe for EGA and VGA 16 color graphic cards
Christian Brauner christian.brauner@ubuntu.com 9p: only copy valid iattrs in 9P2000.L setattr implementation
Eric Farman farman@linux.ibm.com KVM: s390: Clarify SIGP orders versus STOP/RESTART
Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com KVM: x86: Register Processor Trace interrupt hook iff PT enabled in guest
Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com perf: Protect perf_guest_cbs with RCU
Jamie Hill-Daniel jamie@hill-daniel.co.uk vfs: fs_context: fix up param length parsing in legacy_parse_param
Stephen Boyd swboyd@chromium.org remoteproc: qcom: pil_info: Don't memcpy_toio more than is provided
Christophe JAILLET christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr orangefs: Fix the size of a memory allocation in orangefs_bufmap_alloc()
NeilBrown neilb@suse.de devtmpfs regression fix: reconfigure on each mount
Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org kbuild: Add $(KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS) to 'has_libelf' test
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 6 +-- arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 17 +++++--- arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 18 +++++--- arch/csky/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 6 ++- arch/nds32/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 17 +++++--- arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h | 2 + arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 6 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 7 ++- arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 7 +++ arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 9 +++- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 1 + arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c | 28 ++++++++++++ arch/x86/events/core.c | 17 +++++--- arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 9 ++-- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 ++- drivers/base/devtmpfs.c | 7 +++ drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c | 20 ++++----- drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 4 ++ drivers/mtd/chips/Kconfig | 2 + drivers/mtd/maps/Kconfig | 2 +- .../net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/hw.c | 1 + drivers/remoteproc/qcom_pil_info.c | 2 +- drivers/video/fbdev/vga16fb.c | 24 ++++++++++ fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 29 ++++++++---- fs/fs_context.c | 2 +- fs/orangefs/orangefs-bufmap.c | 7 ++- fs/super.c | 4 +- include/linux/fs_context.h | 2 + include/linux/perf_event.h | 13 +++++- kernel/events/core.c | 13 ++++-- sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 33 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still hit the gmp.h compilation issue):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 06:35:24PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still hit the gmp.h compilation issue):
If it bothers you, patches are always welcome.
thanks,
greg k-h
On 1/18/22 8:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 17:05:40 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.93-rc1-ge0476c04ea89 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 1/18/22 9:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 21:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.93-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: e0476c04ea8991e23850dab84ce56ab557c56986 * git describe: v5.10.91-50-ge0476c04ea89 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.92) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.92) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.92) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.92) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 91017, pass: 78176, fail: 498, skip: 11633, xfail: 796
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 46 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 24 total, 22 passed, 2 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:05:40PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 474 pass: 474 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2022/1/19 0:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.93-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.93-rc1 Commit: e0476c04ea8991e23850dab84ce56ab557c56986 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9018 passed: 9018 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9018 passed: 9018 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
gmail says you have sent this mail on "Jan 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM" but https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220118160451.233828401@linuxfoundation.org/ says you have sent it on "18 Jan 2022 17:05:40". :( Is it possible to add my email on the Cc list for the stable review mails please..
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 03:02:43PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
gmail says you have sent this mail on "Jan 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM" but https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220118160451.233828401@linuxfoundation.org/ says you have sent it on "18 Jan 2022 17:05:40". :(
gmail does not like vger.kernel.org, sorry.
Is it possible to add my email on the Cc list for the stable review mails please..
Now added!
greg k-h
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Samuel Zou -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee