This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.37 release. There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.37-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.15.37-rc1
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com selftests/bpf: Add test for reg2btf_ids out of bounds access
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org mm: gup: make fault_in_safe_writeable() use fixup_user_fault()
Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com btrfs: fallback to blocking mode when doing async dio over multiple extents
Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com btrfs: fix deadlock due to page faults during direct IO reads and writes
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks for direct I/O
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com iov_iter: Introduce nofault flag to disable page faults
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com gup: Introduce FOLL_NOFAULT flag to disable page faults
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com iomap: Add done_before argument to iomap_dio_rw
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com iomap: Support partial direct I/O on user copy failures
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com iomap: Fix iomap_dio_rw return value for user copies
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks for buffered I/O
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com gfs2: Eliminate ip->i_gh
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com gfs2: Move the inode glock locking to gfs2_file_buffered_write
Bob Peterson rpeterso@redhat.com gfs2: Introduce flag for glock holder auto-demotion
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com gfs2: Clean up function may_grant
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com gfs2: Add wrapper for iomap_file_buffered_write
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com iov_iter: Introduce fault_in_iov_iter_writeable
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com iov_iter: Turn iov_iter_fault_in_readable into fault_in_iov_iter_readable
Andreas Gruenbacher agruenba@redhat.com gup: Turn fault_in_pages_{readable,writeable} into fault_in_{readable,writeable}
Muchun Song songmuchun@bytedance.com mm: kfence: fix objcgs vector allocation
Dinh Nguyen dinguyen@kernel.org ARM: dts: socfpga: change qspi to "intel,socfpga-qspi"
Dinh Nguyen dinguyen@kernel.org spi: cadence-quadspi: fix write completion support
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com bpf: Fix crash due to out of bounds access into reg2btf_ids.
Hao Luo haoluo@google.com bpf/selftests: Test PTR_TO_RDONLY_MEM
Hao Luo haoluo@google.com bpf: Add MEM_RDONLY for helper args that are pointers to rdonly mem.
Hao Luo haoluo@google.com bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM.
Hao Luo haoluo@google.com bpf: Convert PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL to composable types.
Hao Luo haoluo@google.com bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flag
Hao Luo haoluo@google.com bpf: Replace PTR_TO_XXX_OR_NULL with PTR_TO_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL
Hao Luo haoluo@google.com bpf: Replace RET_XXX_OR_NULL with RET_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL
Hao Luo haoluo@google.com bpf: Replace ARG_XXX_OR_NULL with ARG_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL
Hao Luo haoluo@google.com bpf: Introduce composable reg, ret and arg types.
Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu floppy: disable FDRAWCMD by default
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi | 2 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm.c | 3 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 4 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c | 7 +- drivers/block/Kconfig | 16 + drivers/block/floppy.c | 43 +- drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c | 7 +- drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c | 24 +- fs/btrfs/file.c | 142 +++++- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 28 ++ fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 5 +- fs/erofs/data.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/file.c | 5 +- fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 +- fs/fuse/file.c | 2 +- fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 60 +-- fs/gfs2/file.c | 252 ++++++++++- fs/gfs2/glock.c | 330 ++++++++++---- fs/gfs2/glock.h | 20 + fs/gfs2/incore.h | 4 +- fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 2 +- fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 29 +- fs/ntfs/file.c | 2 +- fs/ntfs3/file.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 6 +- fs/zonefs/super.c | 4 +- include/linux/bpf.h | 101 ++++- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 18 + include/linux/iomap.h | 11 +- include/linux/mm.h | 3 +- include/linux/pagemap.h | 58 +-- include/linux/uio.h | 4 +- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 16 +- kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 2 +- kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 12 +- kernel/bpf/map_iter.c | 4 +- kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c | 2 +- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 488 ++++++++++----------- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 22 +- lib/iov_iter.c | 98 ++++- mm/filemap.c | 4 +- mm/gup.c | 120 ++++- mm/kfence/core.c | 11 +- mm/kfence/kfence.h | 3 + net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 2 +- net/core/filter.c | 64 +-- net/core/sock_map.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_btf.c | 14 + .../bpf/progs/test_ksyms_btf_write_check.c | 29 ++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 19 + 56 files changed, 1472 insertions(+), 652 deletions(-)
On 4/29/22 03:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.37 release. There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.37-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:41:47 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.37 release. There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.37-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 114 tests: 114 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.37-rc1-gff3177a2b8b3 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 4/29/22 4:41 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.37 release. There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.37-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 16:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.37 release. There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.37-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.15.37-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.15.y * git commit: ff3177a2b8b333ce1007cb22d7e2adafdcda9720 * git describe: v5.15.36-34-gff3177a2b8b3 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.35) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.35) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.35) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.35) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 102673, pass: 87138, fail: 713, skip: 13898, xfail: 924
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 291 total, 291 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed * i386: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed * s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41:47PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.37 release. There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 4/29/22 3:41 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.37 release. There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.37-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41:47PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.37 release. There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 62 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1087 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1088 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1089
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip