This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.241-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 4.19.241-rc1
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org lightnvm: disable the subsystem
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "net: ethernet: stmmac: fix altr_tse_pcs function when using a fixed-link"
Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org ia64: kprobes: Fix to pass correct trampoline address to the handler
Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org Revert "ia64: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler"
Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org Revert "ia64: kprobes: Fix to pass correct trampoline address to the handler"
Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au powerpc/64s: Unmerge EX_LR and EX_DAR
Nicholas Piggin npiggin@gmail.com powerpc/64/interrupt: Temporarily save PPR on stack to fix register corruption due to SLB miss
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com net/sched: cls_u32: fix netns refcount changes in u32_change()
Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn hamradio: remove needs_free_netdev to avoid UAF
Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn hamradio: defer 6pack kfree after unregister_netdev
Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu floppy: disable FDRAWCMD by default
Dafna Hirschfeld dafna3@gmail.com media: vicodec: upon release, call m2m release before freeing ctrl handler
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++- arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h | 37 +++++----- drivers/block/Kconfig | 16 +++++ drivers/block/floppy.c | 43 +++++++++--- drivers/lightnvm/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/media/platform/vicodec/vicodec-core.c | 6 +- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/altr_tse_pcs.c | 8 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/altr_tse_pcs.h | 4 -- .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-socfpga.c | 13 ++-- drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c | 5 +- net/sched/cls_u32.c | 18 +++-- 12 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:41:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.241-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.19: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 22 boots: 22 pass, 0 fail 40 tests: 40 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 4.19.241-rc1-gaca3ff930ee4 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 4/29/22 4:41 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.241-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 425 pass: 425 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.241-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
NOTE: 1) As I have reported on the previous stable rc reviews, Deadlock warning has been happening on x86 and Juno [1]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/165094019509.1648.12340115187043043420@noble....
## Build * kernel: 4.19.241-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.19.y * git commit: aca3ff930ee4690457052e389411fa5f5ee8af52 * git describe: v4.19.240-13-gaca3ff930ee4 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19....
## Test Regressions (compared to v4.19.239) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.19.239) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v4.19.239) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.19.239) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 85558, pass: 68834, fail: 1124, skip: 13639, xfail: 1961
## Build Summary * arm: 281 total, 275 passed, 6 failed * arm64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1085
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Uff. I don't see 242-rc1 announcement yet, but our CI system already tested it, and it passed:
commit 667276a8c00ee222a9bcb8f6ebe880529a538bb2 Linux 4.19.242-rc1
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4...
I guess that means that socfpga bug is fixed for us, at least.
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
No cc this time ?
Anyway,
Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed Building arm:multi_v5_defconfig ... failed Building arm:at91_dt_defconfig ... failed
Error: arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek_common.dtsi:223.19-20 syntax error FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
... because a define used in the patch isn't available in v4.19.y.
Guenter
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 07:16:52AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
No cc this time ?
You and Pavel said this, yet I see your response here: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220429234822.GB2444503@roeck-us.net that you sent on Friday.
Did some old email get unstuck and resent somehow?
4.19.241 was released on Sunday, I have not sent out new -rc announcements yet.
confused,
gre gk-h
On 5/3/22 07:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 07:16:52AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
No cc this time ?
You and Pavel said this, yet I see your response here: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220429234822.GB2444503@roeck-us.net that you sent on Friday.
Did some old email get unstuck and resent somehow?
4.19.241 was released on Sunday, I have not sent out new -rc announcements yet.
confused,
No, it is me who is confused. I saw Pavel's e-mail, checked stable, found this announcement, and thought it was a new one since lore reordered it after Pavel's reply.
The problem I reported is for v4.19.241-49-g667276a8c00e, but is also affects v4.14.y.queue and v4.9.y.queue.
Sorry for the noise.
Guenter
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:41:48AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 5/3/22 07:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 07:16:52AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
No cc this time ?
You and Pavel said this, yet I see your response here: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220429234822.GB2444503@roeck-us.net that you sent on Friday.
Did some old email get unstuck and resent somehow?
4.19.241 was released on Sunday, I have not sent out new -rc announcements yet.
confused,
No, it is me who is confused. I saw Pavel's e-mail, checked stable, found this announcement, and thought it was a new one since lore reordered it after Pavel's reply.
The problem I reported is for v4.19.241-49-g667276a8c00e, but is also affects v4.14.y.queue and v4.9.y.queue.
This should now be resolved.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee