This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.95-rc1
Jan Kara jack@suse.cz select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()
David Matlack dmatlack@google.com KVM: x86/mmu: Fix write-protection of PTs mapped by the TDP MMU
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks
Manish Chopra manishc@marvell.com bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs
Manish Chopra manishc@marvell.com bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0
Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 10 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 11 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 3 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 26 +++++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 2 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h | 11 ++- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c | 6 +- .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_fw_defs.h | 2 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h | 3 +- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 75 ++++++++++----- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c | 13 ++- fs/select.c | 63 +++++++------ kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +- 19 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still hit the gmp.h compilation issue):
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 1/27/2022 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:16 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.95-rc1-ga2441d7f51b1 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.95-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: a2441d7f51b176a085cf4ea62e1071ffb4dfcf2c * git describe: v5.10.94-7-ga2441d7f51b1 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 84455, pass: 72139, fail: 461, skip: 11140, xfail: 715
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 46 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 24 total, 22 passed, 2 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/666 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/670
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:16 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.95-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
-
Florian Fainelli -
Fox Chen -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee